Performance tuning
#12
Well, it's kind of obvious you made this so it could be stickied. If it's going to be stickied, it needs to be a little more accurate.
And you won't see 15 horses from an intake on a mustang either
And you won't see 15 horses from an intake on a mustang either
#13
i'm not blasting you man, just constructive criticism. I don't have anything against you.
Just if this is going to be stickied, I don't want people looking at this and being like "oh yea i'm gonna go get MSD ignition and gain lots of power!," or I don't want people to go waste their money on a CAI and bypass valve when they could make the same power with an SRI.
And point 5 is simply not accurate, because as I explained, the oil pump and water pump are turned by the timing belt, not a pulley.
Most of the things I said though were just clarifications.
Just if this is going to be stickied, I don't want people looking at this and being like "oh yea i'm gonna go get MSD ignition and gain lots of power!," or I don't want people to go waste their money on a CAI and bypass valve when they could make the same power with an SRI.
And point 5 is simply not accurate, because as I explained, the oil pump and water pump are turned by the timing belt, not a pulley.
Most of the things I said though were just clarifications.
#15
I just looked up the K&N site and for their CAI Typhoon showed gains of only
5.33 HP @ 4692 RPM for a 2000 honda civic ex and 10.6 HP @ 7150 RPM for a 2000 honda civic Si .They only showed a short ram for the Si and that received gains of 5.76 HP @ 7500 RPM, but take it with a grain of salt.
5.33 HP @ 4692 RPM for a 2000 honda civic ex and 10.6 HP @ 7150 RPM for a 2000 honda civic Si .They only showed a short ram for the Si and that received gains of 5.76 HP @ 7500 RPM, but take it with a grain of salt.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bluemoon2013
Header, Intake, & Exhaust
7
01-09-2015 06:47 PM