Hey guys, this aint my actual car, but its so mad i just thought some of you might wanna check it out! So here are afew pics, what do u think of it?

this is a nice car but it is way too rice for me... the dual exhaust... the big ass spoiler...those doors...pretty much everything on the car is not my style.

__________________
Free Ipod for Canadians too!
http://www.mp3players4free.com/default.aspx?r=161340
$275 Cash - complete 1 free trial offer, refer 5 friends

Dual exhaust + honda = retarted.

Too much bling for me.


Edit: Oh yeah and the trunk needs work.

__________________


And for all you VTECHers out there: Please Click

HCF Map!

i have to agree.

it wouldn't be as bad if the tips werent so big.

__________________
Apexi Boost Gauge, Apexi Meter Control Unit, RMR C/F Gauge Pod, Blitz Fatt DC III, Rexpeed Apex VG

that frigging thing is ugly. :|

__________________

95 dodge intrepid 3.3(400K! )
00 dodge intrepid 2.7(junkyard dog)
92 mitsubishi eclipse(the problem fairy)
GMC cargo van(the newest peice of the family)

now, dual exhaust on a honda is only dumb if its not functional. my friend has a prototype twin turbo kit hes building, and if it goes into production, i will have a functional dual exhaust. one pipe from each turbo back. thats if. though he saw 358 hp to the wheels on a built gsr motor, with 12 psi and ignition retarded 14-16*. so its coming along.

__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.

I think the car's nicely done, but it's not for me.

__________________
Always one ear to reality and one to the music.
RISK!

it'd be better if they didnt do that much stuff, then put on cheezy altezzas.

__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.

Well that's different......

__________________


And for all you VTECHers out there: Please Click

HCF Map!

yeah, but he said when the 2nd turbo (its sequential BTW) kicks in at about 5800 rpm, it loses traction on the dyno, so hes trying to smooth it out, but its showing promise.

__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.