Go Back   HondaCivicForum.com > Your Ride > Header, Intake, & Exhaust




Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-16-2005, 04:40 PM
hondabboy hondabboy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 703
Default which is better?

is it better to get a 4-1 headers or get 4-2-1 headers dont know i think isnt it like the 4-1 is for mid range or something i forgot help me out please[sm=alcoholic.gif]
__________________
"pucutum, pacatap, pucutum, pacatap!!!"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 01-16-2005, 04:54 PM
civiccruiser civiccruiser is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12
Default RE: which is better?

realy depends on what engine you have mate???? you looking for top end or bottom? but as i said what engine you got??
__________________
b16 Bomex civic coupe
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-16-2005, 06:11 PM
sacicons sacicons is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 7,719
Send a message via AIM to sacicons
Default RE: which is better?

4-1 is for top-end power, 4-2-1 is for better mid-range with a little less cherry on the top.
__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2005, 07:00 PM
hondabboy hondabboy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 703
Default RE: which is better?

well i have a d16y7 with a mini swap of a y8 head. i thought the 4-1 is better but i wasnt sure.
__________________
"pucutum, pacatap, pucutum, pacatap!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2005, 07:02 PM
Kappa22 Kappa22 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 3,100
Default RE: which is better?

I think on a Y8 I would go 4-2-1...
__________________
Your Forum Turbo Groupie...

Also your official Forum EF and GTR Brain-Trust
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2005, 07:37 PM
silvercivicsrs silvercivicsrs is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 115
Default RE: which is better?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Kappa22

I think on a Y8 I would go 4-2-1...


Diddo.

-B
__________________
Civic Si conversion.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-17-2005, 12:12 AM
Kappa22 Kappa22 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 3,100
Default RE: which is better?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: silvercivicsrs

Diddo.

-B
I believe you meant to say ditto...
__________________
Your Forum Turbo Groupie...

Also your official Forum EF and GTR Brain-Trust
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-17-2005, 07:43 PM
sacicons sacicons is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 7,719
Send a message via AIM to sacicons
Default RE: which is better?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Kappa22

Quote:
ORIGINAL: silvercivicsrs

Diddo.

-B
I believe you meant to say ditto...
i wanted to say somethin too, but decided not too.
__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors


New Sponsors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
K&N Engineering






All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.