Honda Civic Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Member List   Calendars   Search   Contact Us   Sponsors
  Honda Civic News   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Civic History   Recalls   TSBs   Register   Login  

RE: Turbo vs. all motor

  Printable Version
Honda Civic >> Your Ride >> Engine & Internal >> RE: Turbo vs. all motor Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/9/2006 7:03:46 AM   
Cam


Posts: 96
Joined: 9/2/2005
Status: offline
If you stick with the D you'll no doubt get a shed load of power for a lot less than the b16, but to be perfectly honest, the D's arn't that great. They dont rev as well and simply dont sound as exciting. If your boosting them both i doubt you'd get any more power out of one or the other, but the b16 would still be screaming round at 8000rpm. A b18 is probably the best bet, at least your getting something resembling torque!

_____________________________

Drove an alfa 147 the other day, ****.

(in reply to Marty)
Post #: 21
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/9/2006 10:34:37 AM   
Remmy



Posts: 11165
Joined: 1/11/2005
From: Charleston
Status: offline
Remmy's photo gallery
the B16 IS way over rated.

_____________________________




(in reply to Cam)
Post #: 22
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/9/2006 12:30:14 PM   
Kedawei

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 9/16/2005
Status: offline
Do you still lose power steering with the H swap md?

(in reply to Cam)
Post #: 23
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/9/2006 12:37:00 PM   
Marty


Posts: 8273
Joined: 1/27/2005
From: TN
Status: offline
Marty's photo gallery
Well I think you can but I have done the swap 2 times and both times it was left off. That is like the first thing I do to any civic I get is take the ps off because I simply like the way ir drives alot better without it.

_____________________________

If you are over 18 years old in the United States and do not vote do not bitch about local, state, and national laws. This includes fix it tickets, big speeding fines, and high taxes(gas prices included)

(in reply to Kedawei)
Post #: 24
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/9/2006 3:51:14 PM   
Nail I3unny


Posts: 7705
Joined: 3/18/2005
Status: offline
Nail I3unny's photo gallery
most of the space taken up by an H22 is down low by the tranny. try changing the clutch on an H22 when its in a civic. not a fun time.

but you're right. it doesnt look that much more crowded...a little bit on the left (when looking at the engine bay)


< Message edited by Nail I3unny -- 2/9/2006 3:54:46 PM >

(in reply to Marty)
Post #: 25
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/9/2006 11:12:20 PM   
webucher


Posts: 26
Joined: 2/4/2006
Status: offline
personally, i would buy a b18c1 form a gsr and throw in some cams. great all motor power there. i am looking into buying a 92-95 civic coupe, and those were my exact plans. besides headers, pulley sets, and intake. its your best bet with the b18.

(in reply to Nail I3unny)
Post #: 26
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/9/2006 11:34:10 PM   
Kedawei

 

Posts: 1946
Joined: 9/16/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: md420

That is a H22 swapped EK, now honestly does it look any more cramped than a B series EK?



Are you sure that's not an EG?

The images source is:

http://www.lenon.com/images/h22eg_install.jpg

Either way, great looking install. Very clean.

(in reply to Marty)
Post #: 27
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/10/2006 2:39:39 AM   
Marty


Posts: 8273
Joined: 1/27/2005
From: TN
Status: offline
Marty's photo gallery
My bad it is a eg but it makes no difference

_____________________________

If you are over 18 years old in the United States and do not vote do not bitch about local, state, and national laws. This includes fix it tickets, big speeding fines, and high taxes(gas prices included)

(in reply to Kedawei)
Post #: 28
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/11/2006 11:22:40 AM   
Nail I3unny


Posts: 7705
Joined: 3/18/2005
Status: offline
Nail I3unny's photo gallery
engine bay wise EGs and EKs are about the same. except theres about 1 cubic foot extra in the EK on the right of the block by the timing belt and such

(in reply to Marty)
Post #: 29
RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/11/2006 5:41:16 PM   
yaserkali

 

Posts: 18
Joined: 2/6/2006
Status: offline
After reading all of the above, I think it's best to use a D if you're thinking of a turbo upgrade. I found a Greddy turbo, stage 3 on ebay for only £450! why is it so cheap??? ANy issues or problems with this one?? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8037087002&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT


_____________________________

Honda Civic Sport Coupe
================
Cold Air Intake
6500K super white, blue tinted halogens
Interior Ultra blue neons
Sony ICE

Planned:
Engine Swap or Turbo
Full Cat Back Exhaust
Race Header
16 or 17 inc low profile multi-spok

(in reply to alarum)
Post #: 30
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

 
Honda Civic Forum >> Your Ride >> Engine & Internal
Jump to:

Featured Sponsors
Go
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
forty0414259
remmy11165
fiirkan10543
mill$civic8473
marty8273
mxs8006
fliphkd7207739
nail i3unny7705
sacicons7699
addiction2ba7491

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
K&N Engineering, Inc.

Honda Civic Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Honda Motor Company.