RE: Turbo vs. all motor

Printable Version

Honda Civic >> Your Ride >> Engine & Internal >> RE: Turbo vs. all motor

Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Login Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/14/2006 8:09:46 AM    Kedawei   Posts: 1946 Joined: 9/16/2005 Status: offline The F20B is DOHC VTEC. It uses cams from the JDM Prelude Type-S. http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=641555 Gotcha some notes on the Euro-R and European version Accord Type-R as well. :edit: And I was just messin with ya in that last post. < Message edited by Kedawei -- 2/14/2006 8:11:14 AM > (in reply to Marty) Post #: 41

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/14/2006 2:56:15 PM    Marty Posts: 8273 Joined: 1/27/2005 From: TN Status: offline It's cool, I just feel anymore that if there is a question as to my comments I go ahead and explain them. The F20B is more like a H22 than a F series. I am being honest when I say this, if you ever planned on swapping a engine in and doing nother else to it then I suggest a H22/F20B _____________________________ If you are over 18 years old in the United States and do not vote do not bitch about local, state, and national laws. This includes fix it tickets, big speeding fines, and high taxes(gas prices included) (in reply to Kedawei) Post #: 42

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/15/2006 9:03:47 PM    Remmy Posts: 11161 Joined: 1/11/2005 From: Charleston Status: offline Thats what I want to do. I have read and scanned all over and found that the F20B is more boost friendly. Even though its a little less juice than the H22... I found the F20 in many cases to be cheaper. (I didnt know the s2k was the F20C) _____________________________ (in reply to Marty) Post #: 43

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/15/2006 9:05:54 PM    Remmy Posts: 11161 Joined: 1/11/2005 From: Charleston Status: offline quote: ORIGINAL: md420 I am here to give an objective point of veiw and that is what I do. Of course... you always have a stick up your ass. j.k MD is our bouncer Mod of the forum. _____________________________ (in reply to Marty) Post #: 44

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/16/2006 3:45:23 PM    Nail I3unny Posts: 7705 Joined: 3/18/2005 Status: offline i knew the S2000 didnt have a new series engine...but i didnt know it was an F. sweet. (in reply to Remmy) Post #: 45

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/16/2006 3:53:15 PM    Marty Posts: 8273 Joined: 1/27/2005 From: TN Status: offline f20c and the f22c = S2000 _____________________________ If you are over 18 years old in the United States and do not vote do not bitch about local, state, and national laws. This includes fix it tickets, big speeding fines, and high taxes(gas prices included) (in reply to Nail I3unny) Post #: 46

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/16/2006 3:58:45 PM    Nail I3unny Posts: 7705 Joined: 3/18/2005 Status: offline now that you say that i recall reading it somewhere. IMO the s2000 should have become the s2200 after the change to 2.2l :p (in reply to Marty) Post #: 47

RE: Turbo vs. all motor - 2/16/2006 10:50:07 PM    Kappa22 Posts: 3100 Joined: 12/4/2004 Status: offline That would get pretty confusing. The F20 and 22C have nothing to do with any other F-series engines (or any other Honda engines, for that matter). They're longitudinally mounted, use timing chains, and turn clockwise. _____________________________ Your Forum Turbo Groupie... Also your official Forum EF and GTR Brain-Trust (in reply to Nail I3unny) Post #: 48

Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds

Honda Civic Prices

Honda Civic
Civic Si Concept

Featured Sponsors
Select A Model Accord CR-V Civic Civic Hybrid Element Fit Odyssey Pilot Ridgeline S2000

Top 10 Posters
forty04 14235 remmy 11161 fiirkan 10502 mill$civic 8463 marty 8273 mxs 8006 fliphkd720 7711 nail i3unny 7705 sacicons 7675 addiction2ba 7323

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
K&N Engineering, Inc.