RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Honda Civic Forum Classifieds Photo Gallery Member List Calendars Search Contact Us Sponsors
Honda Civic News Forum FAQ Timeslips Civic History Recalls TSBs Register Login

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Printable Version

Honda Civic Forum >> Misc. >> Sights N Sounds >> RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 4/30/2005 4:35:04 AM

Pete

Posts: 7174
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: Jersey
Status: offline

my friend has a dodge spirit turbo lol funny car was quick but not THAT qucik.

_____________________________

1994 Civic coupe. B18C, A few Bolt Ons.

(in reply to Kappa22)

Post #: 41

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 4/30/2005 1:40:14 PM

se7ensectoolate

Posts: 1049
Joined: 1/1/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lilol89crx

as far as the srt-4 is concerned. lemme see, 4dr, turbo, under 20g. ill take that over the evo or wrx.

Because FWD is teh best?

(in reply to LEVIII)

Post #: 42

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 4/30/2005 1:57:53 PM

ngoti 8tor

Posts: 4424
Joined: 3/24/2005
Status: offline

I'd like an SRT

_____________________________

ngoti8tor

"I see", said the blind man pissing into the wind, "It's all coming back to me now".

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000 LoW reD Si
haha ngo your like the forums...sex guru.

(in reply to Kappa22)

Post #: 43

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 4/30/2005 9:50:52 PM

LEVIII

Posts: 2501
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: se7ensectoolate

quote:

ORIGINAL: lilol89crx

as far as the srt-4 is concerned. lemme see, 4dr, turbo, under 20g. ill take that over the evo or wrx.

Because FWD is teh best?

You think FWD is best or you ar e asking??

_____________________________

Buy your parts from........Speed6motorsports.com

pick 2: reliable, cheap, fast

(in reply to se7ensectoolate)

Post #: 44

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 5/1/2005 12:22:06 AM

sacicons

Posts: 7675
Joined: 6/26/2004
Status: offline

i think hes calling him out for comparing a FWD SRT-4 to AWD cars that out-class the SRT-4.

_____________________________

Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending

(in reply to LEVIII)

Post #: 45

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 5/1/2005 4:14:39 AM

LEVIII

Posts: 2501
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline

Yeah, one time I saw a srt-4 on a race track and...........

just kidding, that will never happen

well, maybe.........................

In GT4.

< Message edited by LEVIII -- 5/1/2005 4:15:11 AM >

_____________________________

Buy your parts from........Speed6motorsports.com

pick 2: reliable, cheap, fast

(in reply to sacicons)

Post #: 46

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 5/2/2005 12:07:58 AM

se7ensectoolate

Posts: 1049
Joined: 1/1/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sacicons

i think hes calling him out for comparing a FWD SRT-4 to AWD cars that out-class the SRT-4.

Correct.

(in reply to sacicons)

Post #: 47

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 5/2/2005 12:35:54 AM

Pete

Posts: 7174
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: Jersey
Status: offline

well heres what u can break this thread down to........brand new SRT4 will cost u say 20,000........and insurance will be high.

OR....................buy a 92-95 hatch or coupe with a blown motor....for say 2500$......get a K20 swap with a 6 SPEED tranny for 5,000.....and boost it for another 3,000 (for a good ass turbo setup.) Insurance will be cheap.....considering ur insuring a 1.6 liter Honda............so with the civic ur going to have a car that will have under 35,000 miles on it.....a 6 speed tranny........and um yea it will run low 11's. total price------------10,500........so almost half the price of the neon.....and nowhere near as ugly.....Se7en has a boosted (lol had) k20 in a 7th gen civic....runnin 11.7 in the 1/4.......so imagine what his setup would run in a hatch?............

so ud pay 20,000 for a 13 second neon?> or 10,500 for a 11 second civic?.........even if u had everything professionally installed......it would still be cheaper than the neon.

Bottom line..............F#CK dodge (unless its a stealth TT or viper)

_____________________________

1994 Civic coupe. B18C, A few Bolt Ons.

(in reply to se7ensectoolate)

Post #: 48

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 5/2/2005 12:47:34 AM

sacicons

Posts: 7675
Joined: 6/26/2004
Status: offline

stealth TT is BARELY a dodge. its damn near a mitsubishi.

_____________________________

Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending

(in reply to Pete)

Post #: 49

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 5/2/2005 12:50:12 AM

Pete

Posts: 7174
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: Jersey
Status: offline

yea its pretty much a VR4........but still. lol id take it.

yo sacs what u think about my whole theory stated above?

_____________________________

1994 Civic coupe. B18C, A few Bolt Ons.

(in reply to sacicons)

Post #: 50