RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Honda Civic Forum Classifieds Photo Gallery Member List Calendars Search Contact Us Sponsors
Honda Civic News Forum FAQ Timeslips Civic History Recalls TSBs Register Login

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Printable Version

Honda Civic Forums >> Misc. >> Sights N Sounds >> RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 7/5/2005 11:25:51 AM

LEVIII

Posts: 2501
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline

My best friend in high school had a NA dodge daytona. Damn thing was always in the shop. Almost every mechanic he took it too would tell him these are the second worst cars to work on, the first, this with a turbo.

_____________________________

Buy your parts from........Speed6motorsports.com

pick 2: reliable, cheap, fast

(in reply to elfreaky70363)

Post #: 71

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 7/5/2005 10:22:27 PM

sacicons

Posts: 7675
Joined: 6/26/2004
Status: offline

no problem.

_____________________________

Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending

(in reply to LEVIII)

Post #: 72

RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4 - 7/20/2005 11:45:18 AM

GSRDevil

Posts: 87
Joined: 7/20/2005
Status: offline

dead thread revival.

quote:

auctally, no. the SRT-4 is NOT a neon. the body looks the same, but it isnt. why would dodge make the srt-4 and neon diffrent cars on the dodge site if they were the same? i cant stop stressing this fact.

Jeezus!

this is the first thread I find here?

Yes the SRT/4 is a Neon, yes Chrysler did build a decent turbo 4 without Mitsubishi (Daytona IROC, Spirit R/T actually Lotus was involved) and the 2.4 is Chrysler, It is based on the 420A not the Mitsubishi 2.4 4G60. Mitsubishi manufactures the turbo. Nothing else