RE: Who would win?
Login  | |
|
RE: Who would win? - 3/26/2007 12:23:52 PM
|
|
|
Patrick
Posts: 4306
Joined: 10/9/2004
Status: offline
|
i understand your point, but traction isnt much better for a built RWD. even with my DRs, i can lay 150 feet of stripes from a dig on the street.
my point about the mustangs is that you guys made it out to sound like a 14 second run is an expectable run from a new mustang GT, and thats only setting people up to get their feelings hurt.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Who would win? - 3/26/2007 12:25:52 PM
|
|
|
fallfast90
Posts: 350
Joined: 1/6/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Patrick
id like his trap speed, and 60' time. I dont know that Im doubting you so much as Im doubting the worlds slowest new GT...
Ive run at 1500' elevation with 95% humidity, and ive still run in the 12.80s...what is the elevation at the track? If you give me the track name,or even the city, I have a list of track elevations somewhere.
We have guys at MF in Denver who are running better than 14s with a GT. Its not a matter of being a "professional driver", its a matter of being a competent driver. Unless he is at an incredible elevation, he shoudl return his car to the dealership, as something is severely wrong with it, and that is probably the worst time Ive heard of coming from an 05 and newer GT. Are you sure that it isnt a 4.0L? IHE on a 4.0L would put the car in the mid to low 14s, from what ive seen..as i know a few modded 4.0L mustang owners. Actually, I will be running next month at an event sponsored by a 4.0L mustang club, so I should have good video of stock-to-heavily modded V6 mustangs on the track.
Sounds like a good time. Where is it located at?
_____________________________
2000 Mustang 3.8 V6 5spd
Project M112 Status: Acquiring Parts
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
Yeah That's Right Rabbit!!! 
