RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.
Login | |
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 5/24/2006 12:00:01 AM
|
|
|
sacicons
 Posts: 7699
Joined: 6/26/2004 Status: online
|
look at the exhaust system on an F1 car. theres little to no BP there, and they can run at 14-18k rpms for hours on end. try and get someone to explain how backpressure could soften the blow of the valves. they would just use softer springs if that were the case. and what about the intake valves?
_____________________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency. quote:
ORIGINAL: Forty04 I choose the rear ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 5/30/2006 10:29:21 AM
|
|
|
Impreza WRX
Posts: 335
Joined: 1/6/2006 Status: offline
|
Well, I recall a "seen it myself" example with a slant 6 Dodge Ram that was held together by improbability. The exhaust was gone, the only part being the header, and the engine spit fire wherever it went. Exhaust valves were not closing all the way anymore so the engine was barely making enough compression to run. This is the example I got. If there is a difference, or the problem is different, let me know!
_____________________________
LoooooOOOOOOOOOZZZ-ERRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 5/30/2006 10:57:34 AM
|
|
|
riceburner700
 Posts: 6518
Joined: 1/21/2005 From: Loveland CO Status: offline
|
for a split second the intake and exhaust valves are open during crankshaft rotation
_____________________________
non-vtec ALL THE WAY cylinder head guru!
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 5/30/2006 9:25:06 PM
|
|
|
sacicons
 Posts: 7699
Joined: 6/26/2004 Status: online
|
or it had another problem. as far as i know (or care) there hasnt been a slant 6 made in a long time, and so I assume this was an old motor, and you sound as if it werent in the best of shape, so chances are it was mistreated in many other ways, and it could have been carbon buildup, bent valves from cam timing being off, or a bad valve job. or any number of other mechanical maladies. let alone that an engine with only a header will bend valves and crack valve seats easily because when you shut it off after a decent run, the head and valves are really hot, and cold air comes back up the header and shocks the metal enough to crack or warp it. you ever seen a frying pan that was put into cold water right after coming off of the stove? it messes them up bad, and itll do the same to the valves and heads.
_____________________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency. quote:
ORIGINAL: Forty04 I choose the rear ending
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 6/1/2006 10:38:13 AM
|
|
|
Impreza WRX
Posts: 335
Joined: 1/6/2006 Status: offline
|
Good explanation. That answers that.
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 6/13/2006 4:27:43 PM
|
|
|
Kahuna
Posts: 68
Joined: 3/12/2006 Status: offline
|
I plan on making a custom exhaust for my Wagon, and I was wondering what size I should use. All the aftermarket mufflers I have found have only a 2.25" inlet. I believe my stock pipe is 1.75". Would I be ok if I went up to a 2.25" pipe, or should I stick with stock size? Thanks
_____________________________
-1990 Honda Civic Wagon Project Car-
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 6/16/2006 8:04:33 PM
|
|
|
96civic285whp
Posts: 565
Joined: 4/20/2006 From: Middletown Status: offline
|
Well in my honda i needed more backpressure, I turboed the car and when i did i took out the cat. I had a tial 38mm wastegate with a .6bar spring(8.7psi). So in all i had a 2.5" down pipe and staight through exhaust. When the boost came up, it shot to 9 psi, then creeped to 10,11,12,13. Nobody could figure out what was going on. Long story short, even with the wastegate wide open, the exhaust was travling through the turbo and out my exhaust causing the boost creep. So i put the baffle back in my exhaust tip and that gave me just enough backpressure to make the exhaust go out the wastegate instead through the turbo, no more boost creep.
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 6/16/2006 8:27:48 PM
|
|
|
pWnEdU
 Posts: 1194
Joined: 6/4/2006 From: Care-a-lot Status: offline
|
Boost creep is a whole 'nother subject, it's a problem with big exhausts on turbo'd cars... I've experienced it a lot before but it's easily fixed.
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 6/17/2006 11:12:23 PM
|
|
|
joe383
Posts: 50
Joined: 6/9/2006 Status: offline
|
Back in June of 2000 or so when I was in high school I remember reading a article called exhaust science in hot rod magazine and they stated that to efficiently scavenge your cylinders during valve overlap that the gas has to be traveling at .45 to .50 mock so about halve the speed of sound. I am not sure how to do the math for this equation but if some one could figure it out it would make picking out header pipe diameter easer. I would assume that you would want this to be at peek HP but I don’t remember that much just the speed stuck with me.
_____________________________
92 DX 1.5 4DR Cold air OBX intake manifold High flow cat DC header Mugen fuel rail Blaster ignition coil 17” rims with 205-40-17 tires Soon to have ported Z6 head swap, Edelbrock throttle body, crower cam, and SI transmission.
|
|
|
|
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 7/2/2006 11:49:55 PM
|
|
|
WhiteCivic15
Posts: 15
Joined: 6/28/2006 From: Albany, NY Status: offline
|
ive got a 94 hatch w/ the 16v 1.5, its got the header from the 1.6 v-tec on it and a catback system from there. i dont have hardly anypower until i hit 3000rpm (it basically hesitates), so i was wondering if putting the stock header back on would fix this problem.
|
|
|
|
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds
Honda Civic Prices
Honda Civic
Civic Si Concept
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us |
Advertising |
Automotive Resources |
Honda Civic Links |
Archive |
About |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© Honda Civic Forum
Honda Civic Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Honda Motor Company.
|