Honda Civic Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Member List   Calendars   Search   Contact Us   Sponsors
  Honda Civic News   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Civic History   Recalls   TSBs   Register   Login  

RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

  Printable Version
Honda Civic >> Your Ride >> Header, Intake, & Exhaust >> RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 7/4/2006 7:55:43 PM   
Impreza WRX


Posts: 335
Joined: 1/6/2006
Status: offline
If your exhaust is 3" wide, that is your problem. General consensus is 2.25-2.5" max. Also, 4-1 header makes less low end than 4-2-1 header.

(in reply to WhiteCivic15)
Post #: 51
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 7/4/2006 7:57:04 PM   
Impreza WRX


Posts: 335
Joined: 1/6/2006
Status: offline
Now I've got the D15B7 engine, and there is no power until you hit 5,000 RPM. Only upgrade is a short ram intake, which did not affect low end power.

(in reply to Impreza WRX)
Post #: 52
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 7/4/2006 8:46:00 PM   
WhiteCivic15

 

Posts: 15
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
what do you mean by '4-1' and '4-2-1' header?

(in reply to Impreza WRX)
Post #: 53
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 8/23/2006 12:38:03 AM   
jbsi99


Posts: 8
Joined: 8/21/2006
Status: offline
So I would like a suggestion on a pipe size for my civic, when my ve-tech is cracking around 6000rpms.... I was thinking about getting a 3inch DC Sport cat-back exhaust.

(in reply to sacicons)
Post #: 54
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 8/23/2006 11:21:19 AM   
Remmy



Posts: 11161
Joined: 1/11/2005
From: Charleston
Status: offline
Remmy's photo gallery
First off its vtec. I have never seen somebody go so out of the way to spell it like you did . Second, a 3 inch exhaust is only good for a DOHC VTEC turbo beast. 2.25 will be the best. Anything more or less will cause you to actually lose power.

_____________________________




(in reply to jbsi99)
Post #: 55
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 9/20/2006 11:04:57 PM   
riceburner700



Posts: 6507
Joined: 1/21/2005
From: Loveland CO
Status: offline
riceburner700's photo gallery
or you got a single slammer running 30pounds of boost with over sized valves...^^^

_____________________________

non-vtec ALL THE WAY

cylinder head guru!


(in reply to Remmy)
Post #: 56
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 10/12/2006 2:08:59 AM   
Benevolance

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 10/12/2006
Status: offline
Well Technically speaking the Ozone Layer has slowly started to replenish itself...CFC's were the main cause of Ozone being depleted. The latest studies show that Ozone Replenishment is slower than thought and tied to cyclical temputures at the poles and wind direction...Also the CFC's hang around in the atmosphere much longer than originally thought.

So clean emissions out of the exhaust pipe will not save the Ozone...But they might help slow global warming(there is no stopping it short of covering the planet with a solar shield straight out of some sci-fi novel)...Smog might go away and the world might breathe a little easier....

So tailpipe responsibility should fall to all of us. At the same time we need to put more pressure on our governments to reduce emissions from power plants and to stop the world from using fuels like coal where there are not seriously advanced smoke stacks with scrubbers and carbon filters& convertors...etc

Automobiles are getting amazingly clean...The fuel we burn is getting very clean...The amount of Carbon released and nasty emissions is dropping fast worldwide from Automobiles. Power Generation is going to be our biggest problem when speaking of air quality in the future...The world is awfully power hungry and windfarms and solar panels are not capable of handling this power demand surge....So it likely means more oil, coal and natural gas will be burned to generate electricity

(in reply to Roto)
Post #: 57
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 11/12/2006 11:07:02 PM   
Impreza WRX


Posts: 335
Joined: 1/6/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WhiteCivic15

what do you mean by '4-1' and '4-2-1' header?


4-1 means all 4 exhaust ports go immediately into 1 pipe
4-2-1 means 4 ports merge to 2 pipes then merge to 1 pipe


4-1 is like this

\\||||//
...| |

but 4-2-1 is like this

\\ || || //
...\ \/ /
.....| |



< Message edited by Impreza WRX -- 11/12/2006 11:09:12 PM >

(in reply to WhiteCivic15)
Post #: 58
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 1/28/2007 7:52:16 PM   
point break 92


Posts: 459
Joined: 1/9/2007
Status: offline
amen, amen.....so your saying to stay with the factory exhaust? or just give it straight 1? you lost me there bro?

(in reply to sacicons)
Post #: 59
RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong. - 2/2/2007 6:43:44 PM   
Eun


Posts: 795
Joined: 12/15/2006
From: Santa Rosa
Status: offline
I just learned about back pressures in my auto tech today. Not a good thing. This thread helped me get more knowledge on the backpressure...thanks.

(in reply to sacicons)
Post #: 60
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

 
Honda Civic Forum >> Your Ride >> Header, Intake, & Exhaust
Jump to:

Featured Sponsors
Go
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
forty0414244
remmy11161
fiirkan10515
mill$civic8471
marty8273
mxs8006
fliphkd7207714
nail i3unny7705
sacicons7675
addiction2ba7375

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
K&N Engineering, Inc.

Honda Civic Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Honda Motor Company.