View Full Version : celica gts vs. civic si


s_bd7
06-06-2007, 05:51 AM
In your guys honest opinion, forget the fact the your honda lovers. Who do you think will win, a '00 celica gts or a '00 civic si? both stocks. And when both are modded whos faster?

SovXietday
06-06-2007, 10:04 AM
Celica GTS all around better stock car than the EM1, however the ability to make the B16A2 a monster is much easier than the Celica engine (can't remember the model number off hand).

2000 Si Newbi
06-06-2007, 05:02 PM
GTS stock for stock. Still say mod for mod it will own the Si

StifflersMom
06-06-2007, 06:21 PM
gotta love paper racing.

okynot43
06-15-2007, 09:55 AM
ORIGINAL: Roto

gotta love paper racing.

haha..weee...

but no, i think the gts would be quicker stock, but once modded, the Si

phsballer123
06-30-2007, 12:38 AM
the gts will win hands down but like everyone says si is the easiest car w/ the most potential to upgrade.

bpapa
06-30-2007, 12:48 AM
Now I've heard the Scion Tc has a modern version of that same celica GTS engine, anyone know if thats true and if its de-tuned at all or what. I have heard some pretty amazing things about the GTS engine, and specifically the AWD Celica GTS (very rare rally inspired version based on what I've heard).

johnb
06-30-2007, 10:43 AM
stock for stock both 2000 the gts would own the SI i know that for a fact.

bpapa
06-30-2007, 03:39 PM
Aren't all GTSs manual?

Marty
06-30-2007, 06:56 PM
The GTS's have the ability to be just as fast as a EM1, sorry to hurt anyones feelings but you have to boost either one to make power and the GTS will love boost just as much as the SI.

SovXietday
06-30-2007, 08:00 PM
No offense but you have to boost every Honda engine to make decent power.[8D]

However, it's no secret that it's easier to find parts and tuning for the EM1 than the Celica GTS.

Marty
06-30-2007, 08:15 PM
true but where there is a will there is a way

*edit* you can generate pretty damn good numbers out of the K's all motor(up around the 300hp mark)

bpapa
06-30-2007, 09:38 PM
Um... the fastest all unibody FF car on the planet is all motor...

http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/honda-insight-import-dragster-ar15501.html (http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/honda-insight-import-dragster-ar15501.html)

Marty
07-01-2007, 12:35 AM
yea that is Bisi's car, him and I spoke on aim on a regular basis till about a year and a half ago. It's also a SOHC :)

BigBruceBaker
07-01-2007, 01:04 AM
yeah but typically speaking boosted cars are almost ALWAYS faster

phsballer123
07-01-2007, 05:49 PM
you know i have actually raced one of those scions w/ the performance package. it has a supercharger i believe suspension pushing 240 hp... i raced one in my si and beat him by about 2 car lenghts going into 3rd

bpapa
07-01-2007, 07:36 PM
Did he know how to drive it? And some info about your Si would help to illustrate.

And also, I am not making fun of you; I genuinely just don't understand what you mean here:
it has a supercharger i believe suspension pushing 240 hp...

Why is the word suspension in this sentence? Again, no offense,I feel like I'm the one who is not understanding something...

BigBruceBaker
07-01-2007, 09:45 PM
Haha yeahi was just gonna comment on that...did you mean that he had 240 horse and some sort of suspension?

Fiasco
07-02-2007, 08:49 AM
my friend is boosting his gts and i can tell you his parts are easily 3x the cost as a civ. Not only that, finding the stuff isnt exactly easy, whereas I see enough honda aftermarket biz to make my head spin. I thought his stock gts was pretty damn quick tho.

johnb
07-02-2007, 09:58 AM
ORIGINAL: Marty

The GTS's have the ability to be just as fast as a EM1, sorry to hurt anyones feelings but you have to boost either one to make power and the GTS will love boost just as much as the SI.


dude. if were talking bone stock and theyre both 2000 youd have to be a REALLY $hitty driver to lose in the GTS. it has way more power all around.

Marty
07-02-2007, 10:23 AM
ORIGINAL: johnb

ORIGINAL: Marty

The GTS's have the ability to be just as fast as a EM1, sorry to hurt anyones feelings but you have to boost either one to make power and the GTS will love boost just as much as the SI.


dude. if were talking bone stock and theyre both 2000 youd have to be a REALLY $hitty driver to lose in the GTS. it has way more power all around.


Dude that is what I just said but in different words.

phsballer123
07-05-2007, 04:07 PM
ok common now you know i did not mean 240 suspension get real. what i forgot a comma or put a word in the wrong place??? let me explain it again so you slower minded people can understand... ready... the car is said to have 240 hp... and the suspension is upgraded! my car is a 2000 si with sri/h/e chip (skunk2), short throw w/ stage 3 clutch, carbon fiber trunk and hood (not that it matters), suspension and minor internal work. i beat him by 2 car lengths into 3rd gear. sorry for getting mad but you guys know what i am trying to say and waist posts by asking questions

Trey
07-05-2007, 04:26 PM
Carbon fiber trunk? I bet that would look pretty crazy. Hopefully you didn't bolt a spoiler onto it.:D

phsballer123
07-05-2007, 11:00 PM
no i hate spoilers i think they are so stupid. those of you who have one need to ask yourself why because a park bench only helps rwd cars

Trey
07-06-2007, 06:26 AM
Agreed. Spoliers not only look stupid but they increase drag and reduce downforce/traction on the front. There's this guy down the street from me with a 6th gen civic. He has nice halo lights, but a 2 foot cf spolier. [:'(]

bpapa
07-06-2007, 10:04 PM
I kinda like some of the aftermarket spoilers for my '02 hatch (mounts to stock location), but they look almost exactly like stock, just an inch or two longer andmost of emhave an integrated high-center LED brake light which I like...

But yeah, aftermarket wings, especially those universal aluminum/carbon ones, blah, simply sillypants.

mybrokenblinker
07-06-2007, 10:31 PM
ORIGINAL: phsballer123

ok common now you know i did not mean 240 suspension get real. what i forgot a comma or put a word in the wrong place??? let me explain it again so you slower minded people can understand... ready... the car is said to have 240 hp... and the suspension is upgraded! my car is a 2000 si with sri/h/e chip (skunk2), short throw w/ stage 3 clutch, carbon fiber trunk and hood (not that it matters), suspension and minor internal work. i beat him by 2 car lengths into 3rd gear. sorry for getting mad but you guys know what i am trying to say and waist posts by asking questions


They are rated at 200 NOT 240...40 hp is a pretty big difference.