yetti8
09-30-2007, 05:48 PM
Is there a difference between an EX transmissions and a V-TECH transmission?
|
View Full Version : EX Trans Vs. V-Tech Trans yetti8 09-30-2007, 05:48 PM Is there a difference between an EX transmissions and a V-TECH transmission? knoklu 09-30-2007, 05:57 PM just to know ur gunna get rapped for this lmao V-TECH lmao danomatic93 09-30-2007, 06:20 PM lol, there is no such this as a VTEC trans. The only part of the engine that is/has VTEC is the head. Every other part is just normal. There is however a difference between EX/Si transmission and the others DX, LX, CX, HX, VX... The EX/Si transmissions are "better". CiViC95EX 09-30-2007, 11:00 PM and it deffinately isnt a "V-TECH" i am pretty sure its a "V-TEC". knoklu 10-01-2007, 08:34 AM its vtec.... lol but no theres is no such thing as vtec trannys riceburner700 10-01-2007, 09:04 AM the ex and si trans are both vtec trannsmissions danomatic93 10-01-2007, 11:26 AM ORIGINAL: riceburner700 the ex and si trans are both vtec trannsmissions come on burner... ...the EX/Si (B000- large bearing) transmissions are NOT VTEC. Yes, they are intended for use with the D16Z6 (92-95 EX/Si) and D16Y8 (96-00 EX) blocks and heads, in which, the heads are VTEC. And yes, the DX, LX, VX, CX,... transmissions (A000 - small bearing) are intended for use with the non-VTEC blocks and heads. BUT... ...there is nothing stopping anyone from using any of the d-series transmissions on any of the d-series blocks/heads (with the A6 engine being THE ONLY exception). |