General Civic Talk Talk about the Honda Civic generally here.

0-60 for '99 DX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 07:43 PM
  #1  
ar151666's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 59
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default 0-60 for '99 DX?

Hey, I'm new to this site and new to civics. I'm just about to buy a 1999 DX sedan and want to know roughly how fast it goes 0-60. I also want to know if it'd be worth it to turbo or not. Umm, thanks ahead of time.
 
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #2  
Superfly's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,380
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Haha not very fast if its bone stock But it's got a D16 which is a great engine to boost....should get you about 200 whp. Turbod16.com is a good site to check out.
 
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
trustdestruction's Avatar
Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,417
From: FL
Default

lol, 12+ seconds?
 
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
croninc's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,059
From: San Leandro, CA
Default

the only way to describe a 0-60 for a stock civic is slow
 
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 11:39 PM
  #5  
WellFedHobo's Avatar
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,961
From: Arkansucks
Default

I checked that one yesterday. Right around 14 seconds.
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 01:16 AM
  #6  
inthezoneac's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,253
From: NC
Default

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/94...id=VIDURVAUT06

if it's anything like this, hella slow
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 04:29 AM
  #7  
ar151666's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 59
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Default

wow...i figured at least ten seconds but i had no idea...kinda sad. If i were to get it around 200 whp would that reduce it substantly or not? Would it be worth to even do that?
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 06:15 AM
  #8  
inthezoneac's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,253
From: NC
Default

200hp would require a turbo.

you'd be doubling the power at 200hp compared to stock and it would make a world of difference.

stock video I posted earlier: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/94...id=VIDURVAUT06

turbo(not sure how much power): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXlrp...eature=related

big difference lol
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 06:45 AM
  #9  
mudferret's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 327
From: Calgary, Ab
Default

Here's a list of times for various models, looks like 8.5 sec for the coupe...or so they say. Count on the time being exponentially slower with a slight incline. Accleration feels about the same as my 1998 4runner (3.4L V6) on flat ground. Uphill the 4runner would smoke the Civic.
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 08:30 AM
  #10  
gunz4me's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 361
From: Louisiana
Default

Also, there is a big difference in times when comparing an automatic to a manual transmission in the EG Civic line. The automatic will ALWAYS shift for the best fuel economy
 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 PM.