V2 VS. Short Ram (AEM)
ORIGINAL: Street Sniper
Oh, my bad. I can't see the pic. It's just one of those little boxes with a red x.
Oh, my bad. I can't see the pic. It's just one of those little boxes with a red x.
Gawd I hate Imagestation sometimes. let me try to get it re-hosted
i think this topic is going into wrong direction, would you guys mind discussin your insues via private messages?
if moderator is watching this topic, please delete all offtopic posts so we can get back to whatever we were discussin
question
which brand is better? aem or injen?
if moderator is watching this topic, please delete all offtopic posts so we can get back to whatever we were discussin
question
which brand is better? aem or injen?
So as I have said before CAI OR V2 get water in the engine(too many puddles here), so if I were to get a short ram system, would it still be worth it (or just stick with stock b/c power diff, wont increase that much with a short ram).Or is it really worth it and why.Thanks for the help.
if cai filter is in the fender i dont think you would suck that much water inside.
as to my brand question, i know both companies make cai and i was thinking which one to buy, but never mind, i got injen cai which i hope i will get tomorrow
as to my brand question, i know both companies make cai and i was thinking which one to buy, but never mind, i got injen cai which i hope i will get tomorrow

From what i remember of my mazda days there are a few things to take into aco**** here:
there are pulses going thru the intake tract so
by making the intake longer these pulses are amplified more at lower rpm's
this helps more air flow into the engine at lower rpms, thus more low-end/midrange torque
with a shorter intake these pulse move up in the rpm range, thus more high-end hp
and from what i can see the V2 appears to take advantage of the venturi effect
I would say it all depends on what you are looking for, but over all i thinkg the V2 will perform best.
*****EDIT*****
Sorry, i did not see that the topic was this old.
there are pulses going thru the intake tract so
by making the intake longer these pulses are amplified more at lower rpm's
this helps more air flow into the engine at lower rpms, thus more low-end/midrange torque
with a shorter intake these pulse move up in the rpm range, thus more high-end hp
and from what i can see the V2 appears to take advantage of the venturi effect
I would say it all depends on what you are looking for, but over all i thinkg the V2 will perform best.
*****EDIT*****
Sorry, i did not see that the topic was this old.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
heathershonda
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade Classifieds
12
May 10, 2007 07:18 AM




