Header, Intake, & Exhaust Custom Exhaust? New Headers? Need Opinions on Intakes? Discuss making your ride breathe better here.

Why you don't get any fuel mileage improvement from performance mods

Old Feb 8, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
Powermidget's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 417
From: So Cal
Default RE: Why you don't get any fuel mileage improvement from performance mods

My understanding is if you allow the motor to run more efficently like ihe and it is buring more completely you will get better mileage an have more even wear...cars are built with restrictions that damage gas milage so if you open up the engine to a more optimal flow it should increase overall performance right? I mean if you have alot of mods then you wont get better gas milage but i would stand by the fact that i/h/e together or seperate can get you better gas milage...i feel as tho that has been my experience
 
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #12  
Misha's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,479
From:
Default RE: Why you don't get any fuel mileage improvement from performance mods

Powermidget,

I/H/E do NOT increase fuel efficiency and do NOT let fuel to be burnt “more completely”. Modern engines already burn about 98-99% of supplied fuel. Those mods merely increase the amount of air that comes into cylinder at the full throttle, and this allows engine to burn more fuel, thus increasing power output. This has nothing to do with fuel efficiency.

Cderalow,

The method you used to measure your mileage is terribly inaccurate. Just for a sake of it, try to calculate and to write down your mileage for several tanks in a row. I guarantee the difference will be more than 10%, most probably closer to 20%.
 
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 02:46 PM
  #13  
pimpciv98's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 82
From:
Default RE: Why you don't get any fuel mileage improvement from performance mods

If an I/H/E did increase fuel economy you can be guaranteed Honda wouldalready be puttingsimilar itemsin their cars already. These days fuel economy is a huge selling point. But they don't so they don't bother.
 
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 08:11 AM
  #14  
cderalow's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,164
From:
Default RE: Why you don't get any fuel mileage improvement from performance mods

ORIGINAL: Misha

Powermidget,

I/H/E do NOT increase fuel efficiency and do NOT let fuel to be burnt “more completely”. Modern engines already burn about 98-99% of supplied fuel. Those mods merely increase the amount of air that comes into cylinder at the full throttle, and this allows engine to burn more fuel, thus increasing power output. This has nothing to do with fuel efficiency.

Cderalow,

The method you used to measure your mileage is terribly inaccurate. Just for a sake of it, try to calculate and to write down your mileage for several tanks in a row. I guarantee the difference will be more than 10%, most probably closer to 20%.

I track my mileage with every tank... my current running average is just under 31mpg since June 2003 (includes time with/without k&n)

since the k&n, it's just over 32mpg
 
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #15  
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,519
From: South Central
Default RE: Why you don't get any fuel mileage improvement from performance mods

ORIGINAL: pimpciv98

If an I/H/E did increase fuel economy you can be guaranteed Honda wouldalready be puttingsimilar itemsin their cars already. These days fuel economy is a huge selling point. But they don't so they don't bother.
They do.

The intake system is in fact great from the factory and that is why I said to install a drop in filter into the stock air box and have you not took the time to look at stock honda exhaust manifolds. From around 1992 on most stock honda manifols use a 4 to 1 or a 4-2-1 header style with the correct size collector. Why do you think stock ITR headers go for so much money? Honda's also use straight through exhaust designs. Think about it, these are all reasons you dont get hardly any extra power from bolt ons, just throttle response.

I am not going to argue this because for one thing I am abovetaking place in pissing matchesover the net but I will say this. You would about have to be dumb to think that a good aftermarket drop in filter is not going to do better than a old dirty pile of **** stock paper composit filter that chokes the hell out of a engine. I am not a "engineer" but I know engines and I know cars. Your talking to a guy that has been into working on cars longer than most on this forum have been alive and anytime you can make a engine work less to attain the same amount of air(because fuel and fuel pressure are adjustable on alot larger scale than air) the better off you are. A perfect thing to look at that is not car related is a vacuume cleaner, turn one on with it set to use the hose attatchment. Listen to it, then cover half of the opening on the hose. The vacuume still sucks in as much air true but listen to how hard it work to do so.
 
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #16  
Misha's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,479
From:
Default RE: Why you don't get any fuel mileage improvement from performance mods

Marty,

Absolutely and I'm not really arguing with you. There is only one small - hmmm - clarification - to what you are saying, including vacuum cleaner example - all those things give some minor economy effect on the full throttleand close to it.

Because some extra air in the cylinder gives you slightly higher effective CR, thus even more slightly improving fuel efficiency plus better flow slightly reduce pumping losses. We are talking something like probably 1-2% efficiency of the full throttle for 10% of power increase. This is already way below our ability to measure it, and if you factor in the percentage of total driving time you use the full throttle, it comes just to nothing. All those good things quickly disappear as soon as you stop pushing it to the floor…


Cderalow,

Can you post the variance between measurements, please? Did you get your car new? Did you make any tune ups when you installed k&n and since then? Or just dropped it there? Was your stock filter clean when you replaced it, or it was there for 100K miles before? Do you mind to install stock filter back and to measure your mileage for some time?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dcell_1t
Mechanical Problems & Technical Chat
2
Dec 20, 2013 07:18 AM
trustdestruction
General Civic Talk
20
Oct 19, 2008 07:19 PM
glada96EX
Header, Intake, & Exhaust
1
Jan 18, 2007 06:28 PM
jwsimons
Inside and Out
8
Mar 9, 2005 11:08 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:05 PM.