supercharged vs turbo charged
i have a 2000 si right now with stock motor but i/h/e chipped, stage 3 clutch, short throw and suspension. is there a gain by having a supercharger rather than turbo. which should i invest in and do you think i will gain quicker launches w/ supercharger???
For driving in normal traffic a supercharger is gonna make more usable HP. For highway travel and open roads, a turbo is gonna be MUCH better. It sorta depends on where you do most of your driving. For me I an going the supercharger route, because I mostly drive in town (under 50 MPH). Just keep reading everything you can and talk to people that have gone both routes. The choice is your. Good Luck with it.
Supercharger = power right away, low RPMs
Turbocharger = you have to wait for power (higher RPM) but you get more power than a S.C.
It all depends on your application.
Turbocharger = you have to wait for power (higher RPM) but you get more power than a S.C.
It all depends on your application.
ORIGINAL: SovXietday
Supercharger = Waste of time and money
Turbocharger = Honda's best friend
Supercharger = Waste of time and money
Turbocharger = Honda's best friend
Supercharger = **** load easier to install, RELIABLE, maintance is more or less care free, instant boost(no spooling) Better for a DD!!! like driving around doing like 55mph mostly
TurboCharger = alot more gains HP+, harder to install...more fabricating, more tuning, more maintance, more parts to go wrong, better for highway
If your supercharger craps out you go back to stock hp--- if your turbo craps out you got a paper wieght for a car.
i like superchargers because they are so much more easier to care for, but you got to love that turbo *BOV*<-- so cool
I DONT WANT TO START A WAR SO JUST LEAVE IT BE ITS JUST MY $0.02


