Nitrous, Super Chargers, & Turbos All charged talk about going FAST.

supercharged vs turbo charged

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #1  
phsballer123's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 251
From:
Default supercharged vs turbo charged

i have a 2000 si right now with stock motor but i/h/e chipped, stage 3 clutch, short throw and suspension. is there a gain by having a supercharger rather than turbo. which should i invest in and do you think i will gain quicker launches w/ supercharger???
 
Old May 11, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #2  
windcalmer's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,509
From:
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

For driving in normal traffic a supercharger is gonna make more usable HP. For highway travel and open roads, a turbo is gonna be MUCH better. It sorta depends on where you do most of your driving. For me I an going the supercharger route, because I mostly drive in town (under 50 MPH). Just keep reading everything you can and talk to people that have gone both routes. The choice is your. Good Luck with it.
 
Old May 11, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #3  
ej6buddy's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,794
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

this has been covered a thousand times,

supercharger= less parts, less power
turbocharger= more parts, more tuning, more power
 
Old May 11, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #4  
AgentofDarkness's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,180
From: Chicago, Illinois
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

Supercharger = power right away, low RPMs
Turbocharger = you have to wait for power (higher RPM) but you get more power than a S.C.
It all depends on your application.
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 05:37 AM
  #5  
Fiirkan's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,485
From: Cornwall, PEI.
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

May i ask why you have your ECU chiped if you don't have anything that requires tuning?
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #6  
Mr Mobsta Man's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,086
From: West Virginia
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

You can chip an ecu to squeeze a few more hp out of your bolt ons and use them to their full potential if I'm not mistaken.

OP: there is a sticky about this.
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
SovXietday's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,913
From: Harleysville, PA
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

Supercharger = Waste of time and money
Turbocharger = Honda's best friend
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #8  
Strong Island's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 471
From:
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

ORIGINAL: SovXietday

Supercharger = Waste of time and money
Turbocharger = Honda's best friend
that is completly bias.....
Supercharger = **** load easier to install, RELIABLE, maintance is more or less care free, instant boost(no spooling) Better for a DD!!! like driving around doing like 55mph mostly

TurboCharger = alot more gains HP+, harder to install...more fabricating, more tuning, more maintance, more parts to go wrong, better for highway

If your supercharger craps out you go back to stock hp--- if your turbo craps out you got a paper wieght for a car.
i like superchargers because they are so much more easier to care for, but you got to love that turbo *BOV*<-- so cool
I DONT WANT TO START A WAR SO JUST LEAVE IT BE ITS JUST MY $0.02
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 08:07 PM
  #9  
Mr Mobsta Man's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,086
From: West Virginia
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

Hes not bias he has had both on his car.
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #10  
phsballer123's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 251
From:
Default RE: supercharged vs turbo charged

i have an ecu to raise the rpms to 9300 instead of 78 or 8000
 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 AM.