Pics and Videos Post Video and Sound clips here. This forum is for video's pertaining to Honda Civic's, Racing (Street/Strip), Interviews, and Off Topic.

2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 03:23 PM
  #11  
SovXietday's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,913
From: Harleysville, PA
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

My next car will probably be an S, RWD > FWD any day.

SRT-4 are nice cars, reliability once you start to make power on them is eh.
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #12  
ic892003's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,140
From:
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

srts are nice, but im a s2000 fan all the way, now ifi could only drop a f22 in my civic
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #13  
cyberx32's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,396
From:
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

srt 4 are nice cars when they are running, but they are not as reliable as hondas.
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #14  
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,519
From: South Central
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

ORIGINAL: cyberx32

srt 4 are nice cars when they are running, but they are not as reliable as hondas.
ok lol
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 09:48 PM
  #15  
SovXietday's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,913
From: Harleysville, PA
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

ORIGINAL: cyberx32

srt 4 are nice cars when they are running, but they are not as reliable as hondas.
Reliability on them is fine until you start modding them incorrectly like 90% of SRT owners do.

YEAH MAN, 25PSI PUMP GAS YO THIS BE COOL!!!
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #16  
polo708's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,156
From: Arizona
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

ORIGINAL: SovXietday

ORIGINAL: cyberx32

srt 4 are nice cars when they are running, but they are not as reliable as hondas.
Reliability on them is fine until you start modding them incorrectly like 90% of SRT owners do.

YEAH MAN, 25PSI PUMP GAS YO THIS BE COOL!!!
but its hella fast for 2 weeks, haha.
 
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #17  
s2sexy's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

i am a s2000 owner an never liked them till i drove i fell in love. dont get me wrong i love the srt4 but for the money you cant beat the s2000 rwd high rpm lots of power. plus it pulls the ladies!!! i would deff pick an s2000
 
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #18  
Fiirkan's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,485
From: Cornwall, PEI.
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000


ORIGINAL: Peg_Leg

i have a question are you pushing this website?
My Guess is yes...

And i hate the SRT4 for 1 reason... it sounds like it's farting all the ****ing time
 
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #19  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,703
From:
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

The S2000 is all motor and runs what the srt-4 runs boosted...not to mention the reliability drop once modded on the srt-4's. I'd LOVE to own an srt, but wouldn't ever be dumb enough to take one over a beastly rwd platform. Marty I don't think you've driven an S2000, because they don't feel anything cheap when on the road. Although the cluster is a bit awkward, they're sooo much nicer than an srt. And whoever it was that said a modded srt would rape an S2000 is a fool, the s2000 responds so much better to mods, and is still reliable too.
 
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #20  
reaper2022's Avatar
Super Cereal Admin
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,081
From: Lexington, KY
Default RE: 2004 SRT4 vs Honda S2000

^ I believe that meant a modded srt-4 would rape a stock s2000.

You really can't argue with the srt-4's acceleration. I believe its 0-60 time is the same as a viper's.

But I think I'd still take an s2000 over an srt-4 just because it's rwd. Well, that and because in order to upgrade the srt-4's turbo, you have to replace the exhaust manifold, too... the turbine is built into the manifold...
 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 AM.