We're adding and testing new features:  Create your Garage, used it? Give us some feedback here.

Go Back   HondaCivicForum.com > Your Ride > Header, Intake, & Exhaust



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2005, 01:41 AM
sacicons sacicons is offline
HCF Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 7,713
Send a message via AIM to sacicons
Default Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

Backpressure: The myth and why it's wrong.

I. Introduction

One of the most misunderstood concepts in exhaust theory is backpressure. People love to talk about backpressure on message boards with no real understanding of what it is and what it's consequences are. I'm sure many of you have heard or read the phrase "Hondas need backpressure" when discussing exhaust upgrades. That phrase is in fact completely inaccurate and a wholly misguided notion.

II. Some basic exhaust theory

Your exhaust system is designed to evacuate gases from the combustion chamber quickly and efficently. Exhaust gases are not produced in a smooth stream; exhaust gases originate in pulses. A 4 cylinder motor will have 4 distinct pulses per complete engine cycle, a 6 cylinder has 6 pules and so on. The more pulses that are produced, the more continuous the exhaust flow. Backpressure can be loosely defined as the resistance to positive flow - in this case, the resistance to positive flow of the exhaust stream.

III. Backpressure and velocity

Some people operate under the misguided notion that wider pipes are more effective at clearing the combustion chamber than narrower pipes. It's not hard to see how this misconception is appealing - wider pipes have the capability to flow more than narrower pipes. So if they have the ability to flow more, why isn't "wider is better" a good rule of thumb for exhaust upgrading? In a word - VELOCITY. I'm sure that all of you have at one time used a garden hose w/o a spray nozzle on it. If you let the water just run unrestricted out of the house it flows at a rather slow rate. However, if you take your finger and cover part of the opening, the water will flow out at a much much faster rate.

The astute exhaust designer knows that you must balance flow capacity with velocity. You want the exhaust gases to exit the chamber and speed along at the highest velocity possible - you want a FAST exhaust stream. If you have two exhaust pulses of equal volume, one in a 2" pipe and one in a 3" pipe, the pulse in the 2" pipe will be traveling considerably FASTER than the pulse in the 3" pipe. While it is true that the narrower the pipe, the higher the velocity of the exiting gases, you want make sure the pipe is wide enough so that there is as little backpressure as possible while maintaining suitable exhaust gas velocity. Backpressure in it's most extreme form can lead to reversion of the exhaust stream - that is to say the exhaust flows backwards, which is not good. The trick is to have a pipe that that is as narrow as possible while having as close to zero backpressure as possible at the RPM range you want your power band to be located at. Exhaust pipe diameters are best suited to a particular RPM range. A smaller pipe diameter will produce higher exhaust velocities at a lower RPM but create unacceptably high amounts of backpressure at high rpm. Thus if your powerband is located 2-3000 RPM you'd want a narrower pipe than if your powerband is located at 8-9000RPM.

Many engineers try to work around the RPM specific nature of pipe diameters by using setups that are capable of creating a similar effect as a change in pipe diameter on the fly. The most advanced is Ferrari's which consists of two exhaust paths after the header - at low RPM only one path is open to maintain exhaust velocity, but as RPM climbs and exhaust volume increases, the second path is opened to curb backpressure - since there is greater exhaust volume there is no loss in flow velocity. BMW and Nissan use a simpler and less effective method - there is a single exhaust path to the muffler; the muffler has two paths; one path is closed at low RPM but both are open at high RPM.

IV. So how did this myth come to be?

I often wonder how the myth "Hondas need backpressure" came to be. Mostly I believe it is a misunderstanding of what is going on with the exhaust stream as pipe diameters change. For instance, someone with a civic decides he's going to uprade his exhaust with a 3" diameter piping. Once it's installed the owner notices that he seems to have lost a good bit of power throughout the powerband. He makes the connections in the following manner: "My wider exhaust eliminated all backpressure but I lost power, therefore the motor must need some backpressure in order to make power." What he did not realize is that he killed off all his flow velocity by using such a ridiculously wide pipe. It would have been possible for him to achieve close to zero backpressure with a much narrower pipe - in that way he would not have lost all his flow velocity.

V. So why is exhaust velocity so important?

The faster an exhaust pulse moves, the better it can scavenge out all of the spent gasses during valve overlap. The guiding principles of exhaust pulse scavenging are a bit beyond the scope of this doc but the general idea is a fast moving pulse creates a low pressure area behind it. This low pressure area acts as a vacuum and draws along the air behind it. A similar example would be a vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed on a dusty road. There is a low pressure area immediately behind the moving vehicle - dust particles get sucked into this low pressure area causing it to collect on the back of the vehicle. This effect is most noticeable on vans and hatchbacks which tend to create large trailing low pressure areas - giving rise to the numerous "wash me please" messages written in the thickly collected dust on the rear door(s).

VI. Conclusion.

SO it turns out that Hondas don't need backpressure, they need as high a flow velocity as possible with as little backpressure as possible.
To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
  #2  
Old 02-13-2005, 02:57 AM
polo708 polo708 is offline
HCF Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,157
Send a message via AIM to polo708
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

Dear god I hope you "cut and pasted" that. Thats a crap load of typing.

good article though, hopefully it will clear up some confusion, sticky anyone?
__________________
-brian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2005, 11:19 AM
Dickie Dickie is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 212
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

good post schmee
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2005, 12:10 PM
sacicons sacicons is offline
HCF Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 7,713
Send a message via AIM to sacicons
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

damn right i cut and pasted.
__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2005, 12:11 PM
sacicons sacicons is offline
HCF Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 7,713
Send a message via AIM to sacicons
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

and its already a sticky.
__________________
Yes, there's a "Replacement for Displacement". Its called Volumetric Efficiency.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Forty04

I choose the rear ending
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2005, 01:18 PM
burgo990 burgo990 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 107
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

good work fella, i dont know if you get them over there but MGF's also has a clever little system for back presure. they just use an actuator which works off the engine vacume to control a butterfly valve in one of the two exits on the back box. simple yet effective
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2005, 02:56 PM
shopmanual shopmanual is offline
HCF Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 139
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

Thanks for finally clearing up the whole backpressure thing. Everybody I've talked to says you need it, but they have no idea why.
__________________
Magnaflow Wide Open Performance Catbacks
Pioneer speakers/head unit
Kosei K1 14" Rims
Honda OEM Foglight Kit
Honda Spoiler
K&N Air Filter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2006, 06:03 PM
sickcivic07 sickcivic07 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 74
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

Now you guys have me worried I'm gonna have to check it.
__________________
2000 Honda Civic Si
Cold-air intake
Greddy exhaust
Vex Wheels
Short shifter
2 Kicker Cvr 12's
Rockford fosgate amp
DC Sports header
Tokico Coil-overs
Reactive Plug Wires
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2006, 10:32 AM
Impreza WRX's Avatar
Impreza WRX Impreza WRX is offline
HCF Member
2003 Chevrolet Cavalier
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 346
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

I always thought it's because if there is no back pressure (i.e. your exhaust fell off at the header) the exhaust valves won't seat properly (as in slam shut harder) and will slowly mushroom up over time...
__________________
LoooooOOOOOOOOOZZZ-ERRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-23-2006, 12:51 PM
ArmedSalad ArmedSalad is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1
Send a message via AIM to ArmedSalad Send a message via Yahoo to ArmedSalad
Default RE: Backpressure: The Myth and Why It's Wrong.

Impreza's explanation is what i was given by a few people. an amount of backpressure is needed for the valve to work properly. otherwise too little or no BP would cause them to become damaged over time.
__________________
not a owner...yet. looking at 2006/2007 Civic Si Fiji Blue Pearl.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
back, backpressure, cat, civic, engine, exhaust, good, headers, honda, messaging, myth, myths, pressure, problem, wrong

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
K&N Engineering


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


Honda and the Honda marquee are registered trademarks of the American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Neither American Honda Motor Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates shall bear any responsibility for HondaCivicforum.com content, comments, or advertising. HondaCivicforum.com is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Company in any way. American Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCivicforum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.