ECU Tuning & Fuel Management Discuss electronics and related components within.

Another chip: real or fake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #1  
Remmy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,248
From: Charleston
Default Another chip: real or fake?

I question this one but im not sure, what are you guys opinions on this?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/REAL-...94201336QQrdZ1
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #2  
ngoti 8tor's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

I wouldn't try it.
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #3  
maddawg's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 285
From:
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

i'm one of those people who let a lot of people guinea pig a product before i buy. so i need testomonies to boost the product
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #4  
Street Sniper's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
From:
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

Same crap, pretty box. But hell, they say +20Hp or your money back. I say go for it.

I have some actual chips that I can't use anymore if anybody wants one.
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 10:14 PM
  #5  
ngoti 8tor's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

ORIGINAL: Street Sniper
they say +20Hp or your money back. I say go for it.
How can you guarantee you'll get your money back from someone on eBay? And the kicker is, you pay for shipping to buy it, and you pay for shipping again to return it.
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #6  
Pete's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,168
From: Jersey
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

im not to familiar with that name brand. Ive heard positive things about performance chips made by "Superchips" and someone told me Skunk 2 makes chips as well. I woudlnt trust anything with an off brand name. Snipers right.......its the same ****....just a bigger microchip and a nicer box. Its prolly just going to be a 40 cent resistor tht tricks the ECU to thinkin the air intake is colder, resulting in poorer gas milage and thats it. Did u google it for some testimonials? Thats what id do. "If something seems too good to be true........more than likely it is"
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 10:35 PM
  #7  
ngoti 8tor's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

ORIGINAL: FastFwd
i bought it for 12 australian dollars. in US dollars thats roughly 8-9. It was crap all, i bought it for the hell of it. im getting a VAFC in 3 weeks anyways, i just wanted to get it to see if it was a pile of crap
Maybe "Mr. Moneybags" will buy it for the hell of it, just to see if it's a pile of crap.
 
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #8  
mill$civic's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,469
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

I found this if anyone is interested.....

Engine Controls and Performance Chips
The algorithms that control the engine are quite complicated. The software has to allow the car to satisfy emissions requirements for 100,000 miles, meet EPA fuel economy requirements and protect engines against abuse. And there are dozens of other requirements to meet as well.
The engine control unit uses a formula and a large number of lookup tables to determine the pulse width for given operating conditions. The equation will be a series of many factors multiplied by each other. Many of these factors will come from lookup tables. We'll go through a simplified calculation of the fuel injector pulse width. In this example, our equation will only have three factors, whereas a real control system might have a hundred or more.


Pulse width = (Base pulse width) x (Factor A) x (Factor B)

In order to calculate the pulse width, the ECU first looks up the base pulse width in a lookup table. Base pulse width is a function of engine speed (RPM) and load (which can be calculated from manifold absolute pressure). Let's say the engine speed is 2,000 RPM and load is 4. We find the number at the intersection of 2,000 and 4, which is 8 milliseconds.


RPM Load
1 2 3 4 5
1,000 - 1 2 3 4 5
2,000 - 2 4 6 8 10
3,000 - 3 6 9 12 15
4,000 - 4 8 12 16 20

In the next examples, A and B are parameters that come from sensors. Let's say that A is coolant temperature and B is oxygen level. If coolant temperature equals 100 and oxygen level equals 3, the lookup tables tell us that Factor A = 0.8 and Factor B = 1.0.


A- FactorA B -Factor B
0- 1.2 0- 1.0
25- 1.1 1- 1.0
50- 1.0 2 - 1.0
75- 0.9 3- 1.0
100- 0.8 4 -0.75

So, since we know that base pulse width is a function of load and RPM, and that pulse width = (base pulse width) x (factor A) x (factor B), the overall pulse width in our example equals:


8 x 0.8 x 1.0 = 6.4 milliseconds

From this example, you can see how the control system makes adjustments. With parameter B as the level of oxygen in the exhaust, the lookup table for B is the point at which there is (according to engine designers) too much oxygen in the exhaust; and accordingly, the ECU cuts back on the fuel.

Real control systems may have more than 100 parameters, each with its own lookup table. Some of the parameters even change over time in order to compensate for changes in the performance of engine components like the catalytic converter. And depending on the engine speed, the ECU may have to do these calculations over a hundred times per second.

Performance Chips
This leads us to our discussion of performance chips. Now that we understand a little bit about how the control algorithms in the ECU work, we can understand what performance-chip makers do to get more power out of the engine.

Performance chips are made by aftermarket companies, and are used to boost engine power. There is a chip in the ECU that holds all of the lookup tables; the performance chip replaces this chip. The tables in the performance chip will contain values that result in higher fuel rates during certain driving conditions. For instance, they may supply more fuel at full throttle at every engine speed. They may also change the spark timing (there are lookup tables for that, too). Since the performance-chip makers are not as concerned with issues like reliability, mileage and emissions controls as the carmakers are, they use more aggressive settings in the fuel maps of their performance chips.
 
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #9  
ngoti 8tor's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

And you'll find that most of these "wannabe" chips are made to fit quite a few different cars, whereas the "real deal" chips are made for specific cars.
 
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #10  
Remmy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,248
From: Charleston
Default RE: Another chip: real or fake?

ORIGINAL: pcupo12

im not to familiar with that name brand. Ive heard positive things about performance chips made by "Superchips" and someone told me Skunk 2 makes chips as well. I woudlnt trust anything with an off brand name. Snipers right.......its the same ****....just a bigger microchip and a nicer box. Its prolly just going to be a 40 cent resistor tht tricks the ECU to thinkin the air intake is colder, resulting in poorer gas milage and thats it. Did u google it for some testimonials? Thats what id do. "If something seems too good to be true........more than likely it is"
Its not a resistor though, it states that.
 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:33 PM.