General Civic Talk Talk about the Honda Civic generally here.
View Poll Results: Best motor in your opinion?
H22A Type S
5
50.00%
B18C Type R
5
50.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Need some advice. Opinions wanted!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 05:08 PM
  #11  
ej6buddy's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,794
Default

B18c is a better choice for you then, it takes abuse a little better than a h22.

As for the h2b swap, it's not really a transmission swap, it's just an adapter that allows the use of a b series transmission (preferably b16) with the h series block. It's much more simple than modifying for an h series transmission. Only con is cost. As for a sleeving job, it's nice to know people if you're in the business, so I understand.
 
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #12  
seph07's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 23
From: Quebec, Canada... Yes a Frenchie !
Default

Originally Posted by ej6buddy
I can't follow one single thing in your post. Plus about 99.9% of it is incorrect.
I don't know if it's because french canadians are not ricers, but here a B18 is usually not having 300 HP... We use bigger engines to reach 300 HP. And we don't install turbo kits on civic !?!

I know one kind of B18 that can reach 300 Hp without being a rice : Frankenstein... Perhaps you guys think different...

Civic 95 + 300 HP B18 Turbo 15 PSI = Ricer
Civic 2005 + 200 HP without turbo kit = Nice car
Civic 2009 + 300 HP Supercharged = very nice car
 
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 05:46 AM
  #13  
ej6buddy's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,794
Default

^ Again, I can't really follow some of your post. Phrases such as "here a b18 is usually not having 300hp" isn't grammatically correct. And we don't care that you're french canadian, it's just that no one can understand you because you can't type. And if you think you can reach 300 hp with a b18 lsv, then you don't know anything in the first place. And why are you comparing cars that are 10 years apart from one another? No one really cares about your tastes of cars here. Efficiency is what it's all about, if you say you have to use a bigger engine to reach 300hp in canada, then that's just sad. period.
 
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #14  
2000Ex's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 690
From:
Default

You made the right decision. H22 are just beasts in civics, like bad beasts. Really heavy on the front axel and way more problems than sticking with the 1.8l
 
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 01:57 PM
  #15  
ej6buddy's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,794
Default

Originally Posted by 2000Ex
You made the right decision. H22 are just beasts in civics, like bad beasts. Really heavy on the front axel and way more problems than sticking with the 1.8l
^ Again, now you need to read up on some knowledge, lol. With the correct suspension setup, you wouldn't have any more problems than you would with a 1.8 liter.

http://honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=684550
 
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #16  
jpnolan's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,833
From: Miami, Florida
Default

Wait what car is this going into? That will make it alot easier for us to help you. If you have an ef you will not do the h22. Trust me lol.
 
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #17  
2000Ex's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 690
From:
Default

Originally Posted by ej6buddy
With the correct suspension setup,

http://honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=684550
hell you could put a 4l in there if you wanted to. I'm just saying the 1.8l is easier.
 
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #18  
trustdestruction's Avatar
Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,417
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by seph07
I know one kind of B18 that can reach 300 Hp without being a rice : Frankenstein... Perhaps you guys think different...

Civic 95 + 300 HP B18 Turbo 15 PSI = Ricer
You're a retard and you have once again proved you have no idea what you are talking about. Also, what does the specific PSI have to do with being rice? What does any of that have to do with rice?

Originally Posted by 2000Ex
hell you could put a 4l in there if you wanted to. I'm just saying the 1.8l is easier.
He was pointing out that it's not heavier on the front axle by enough to make a difference. You said that it was really heavy. He proved you wrong.
 

Last edited by trustdestruction; Apr 18, 2009 at 02:29 PM.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #19  
plethoric33's Avatar
March 2010 ROTM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,962
From: Louisville, KY
Default

This the single most ignorant thread on this entire forum. By far. Seph07 is making all of us dumber with every post he makes.
 
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #20  
NIKE H34D's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,428
From: Pueblo, CO
Default

seph!!!!!!!!!!! you and low life should jsut go have buttsex already
 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 PM.