cold air
June 2010 ROTM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,284
From: Milwaukee, WI
Super Cereal Admin
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,081
From: Lexington, KY
RE: cold air
I'll save you the work:
CAI - Increases mid-range and top-end power slightly; maybe one or two horses. Expensive
SRI (short-ram intake) - Slightly smaller gains than CAI, butbetter throttle response; half the price of a CAI.
If you absolutley must have the maximum possible gains, go with a CAI. If you jsut want a "peppier" car, go with a SRI
CAI - Increases mid-range and top-end power slightly; maybe one or two horses. Expensive
SRI (short-ram intake) - Slightly smaller gains than CAI, butbetter throttle response; half the price of a CAI.
If you absolutley must have the maximum possible gains, go with a CAI. If you jsut want a "peppier" car, go with a SRI
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,442
From: Marquette, MI
RE: cold air
ORIGINAL: reaper2022
I'll save you the work:
CAI - Increases mid-range and top-end power slightly; maybe one or two horses. Expensive
SRI (short-ram intake) - Slightly smaller gains than CAI, butbetter throttle response; half the price of a CAI.
If you absolutley must have the maximum possible gains, go with a CAI. If you jsut want a "peppier" car, go with a SRI
I'll save you the work:
CAI - Increases mid-range and top-end power slightly; maybe one or two horses. Expensive
SRI (short-ram intake) - Slightly smaller gains than CAI, butbetter throttle response; half the price of a CAI.
If you absolutley must have the maximum possible gains, go with a CAI. If you jsut want a "peppier" car, go with a SRI
