Header, Intake, & Exhaust Custom Exhaust? New Headers? Need Opinions on Intakes? Discuss making your ride breathe better here.

Limitations of these exhausts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #1  
Lost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,162
From: Victoria, B.C. Canada
Default Limitations of these exhausts

So Im planning out my parts list for the exhaust system and thinking I want to go with a nice quiet exhaust. The engine it trails will be an N/A b20vtec and of course I need all the extra air flow I can get as I would like to put down the best numbers I can.

I like the Apexi WS2 but its only 60mm which is 2.36 inches. You guys think its too small? Should I just fab up a 3" exhaust and buy a good name brand muffler?
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #2  
GReddy_Civic's Avatar
Snail'n Admin
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,040
From: Don't worry about it
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

well I know a lot of turbobacks are 3". I honestly dont think that you should go 3". I think if you're going N/A you could go with a 2.5" Thats just my thoughts, could be wrong
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 06:46 PM
  #3  
Lost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
HCF Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,162
From: Victoria, B.C. Canada
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

ya im wondering if a 3" could hurt my performance, Iv heard of that happening
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #4  
GReddy_Civic's Avatar
Snail'n Admin
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,040
From: Don't worry about it
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

possibly if you lose backpressure
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #5  
warner_ro's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 323
From:
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

you'll be good with the WS2. 3" is for like if your running turbo or something.
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #6  
KoshaK's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 687
From: Maryland
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

ORIGINAL: GReddy_Civic

well I know a lot of turbobacks are 3". I honestly dont think that you should go 3". I think if you're going N/A you could go with a 2.5" Thats just my thoughts, could be wrong
Agreed. The magnaflow for my car is about 2.25..
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #7  
Sigracer10's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,184
From: Texas
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

for N/A run 2.25 or 2.5. 3 inch on a honda only does any good if you have a turbo or supercharger
 
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 03:47 AM
  #8  
FlipHKD720's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,442
From: Marquette, MI
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

Tony (Forty04) said his Megan Drift Spec worked will for both N/A and F/I
 
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #9  
Everyday Getaway's Avatar
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 516
From:
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

https://www.hondacivicforum.com/m_39893/tm.htm

btw, everywhere that I've read recomends 2.25" piping onany N/A 4cylinder
 
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #10  
mybrokenblinker's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,360
From:
Default RE: Limitations of these exhausts

think of it as a total power number...a b20 vtec won't make anything over 200 without some work (someone correct me if I'm wrong) and even if it does, it won't be by much, you should be fine with your 2.36 piping.
 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 PM.