EK Swaps 1996-2000 Civics

1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 05:47 PM
  #1  
JFrog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
From:
Default 1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

This may be a stupid question but here it is anyway. If the only difference between the H22 in the 1996 VTEC model and the 1997 SH model is the fact that the 1997 has ATTS why do manufacturer's of Headers have to determine the difference between the 1996 and 1997?? Wouldn't it be the same Header? Isn't the Engine the exact same? I read that it's the ATTS that squeezes out the extra 5 hp.

I'm asking this because when I had my H22 swap into my 96 Civic done, I'm not quite sure what year the H22A is. Anyway, I'm pretty sure it's either of those two years. I want to get a new header for the block that I have but if there is a difference between the two I need to know so I don't buy the wrong Header.

Thanks
 
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #2  
diamondalpine's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 34
Default RE: 1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

where did you get your engine? Do you like the swap? I am really interested in doing it on my car. any info would be greatly apreciated. Everyone on this web site seems to hate the h22. I look at it this way it is more horse power for the money.
 
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #3  
Nail I3unny's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,702
From:
Default RE: 1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

its also heavier, has a big footprint, isnt fine tuned like other honda moters, and is bad for boosting

but with the right work done it can be one sick motor
 
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,519
From: South Central
Default RE: 1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

The H22 is not bad for boosting, no worse than a D series and what makes it not "fine tuned" like other honda motors........nothing. It is the big block honda motor and has hella ability to make great power and tq.
 
Old Sep 9, 2005 | 06:29 AM
  #5  
US3R!!!11one's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 300
From:
Default RE: 1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

The H22 is not bad for boosting, no worse than a D series and what makes it not "fine tuned" like other honda motors........nothing. It is the big block honda motor and has hella ability to make great power and tq.
Glad you said it, because my version would have been not-as-nice toward the poster. But itz k I still luv'z j00 |3|_|/\//\/y!
 
Old Sep 9, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #6  
ngoti 8tor's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
Default RE: 1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

ORIGINAL: Nail I3unny
its also heavier, has a big footprint, isnt fine tuned like other honda moters, and is bad for boosting
Huh? Can you please explain that? I can't see Honda putting a rough running engine into a Lude.
 
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 12:12 AM
  #7  
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,519
From: South Central
Default RE: 1996 Prelude VS. 1997 Prelude

It just dont rev as high as the B series and K series, but what it losses in high rpm abilities it by far makes up for it with low end tq
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flewthecoupe
General Civic Talk
2
Nov 25, 2010 06:12 AM
whtrastaman
General Civic Talk
3
Oct 10, 2008 11:28 PM
sluggo20031
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade Classifieds
0
Sep 13, 2004 04:03 PM
2000Si
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade Classifieds
5
Aug 24, 2004 12:02 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:06 PM.