2003, LX vs EX

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 19, 2006 | 03:10 PM

OpTiCaL

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 243

From:

2003, LX vs EX

What are the physical differences in the engines in both cars? Cause the LX has 115 hp and the EX has 127, why is this?

May 19, 2006 | 03:40 PM

Nail I3unny

HCF Member

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 7,702

From:

RE: 2003, LX vs EX

i cant find anything anywhere but id imagine its a combination of the vtec and some added compression. i dont know much about d17s.

May 19, 2006 | 08:10 PM

OpTiCaL

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 243

From:

RE: 2003, LX vs EX

yeah, that is the same problem i am having too, cant find ****! i wonder if there is anything in Haynes manual... i guess it would help if i had one, lol.

May 19, 2006 | 10:35 PM

03civda

HCF Member

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 45

RE: 2003, LX vs EX

The EX has VTEC and the LX/DX does not. Also, the cat on the LX/DX is connected to the header, where as with the EX, it is further down under the car. Those are the main differences.