Engine & Internal Chat about beefing up your engine's insides here.

Turbo vs. all motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 06:03 AM
  #21  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
HCF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 96
From:
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

If you stick with the D you'll no doubt get a shed load of power for a lot less than the b16, but to be perfectly honest, the D's arn't that great. They dont rev as well and simply dont sound as exciting. If your boosting them both i doubt you'd get any more power out of one or the other, but the b16 would still be screaming round at 8000rpm. A b18 is probably the best bet, at least your getting something resembling torque!
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 09:34 AM
  #22  
Remmy's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,248
From: Charleston
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

the B16 IS way over rated.
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #23  
Kedawei's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,930
From:
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

Do you still lose power steering with the H swap md?
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #24  
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,519
From: South Central
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

Well I think you can but I have done the swap 2 times and both times it was left off. That is like the first thing I do to any civic I get is take the ps off because I simply like the way ir drives alot better without it.
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #25  
Nail I3unny's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,702
From:
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

most of the space taken up by an H22 is down low by the tranny. try changing the clutch on an H22 when its in a civic. not a fun time.

but you're right. it doesnt look that much more crowded...a little bit on the left (when looking at the engine bay)
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 10:12 PM
  #26  
webucher's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
From:
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

personally, i would buy a b18c1 form a gsr and throw in some cams. great all motor power there. i am looking into buying a 92-95 civic coupe, and those were my exact plans. besides headers, pulley sets, and intake. its your best bet with the b18.
 
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 10:34 PM
  #27  
Kedawei's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,930
From:
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

ORIGINAL: md420

That is a H22 swapped EK, now honestly does it look any more cramped than a B series EK?
Are you sure that's not an EG?

The images source is:

http://www.lenon.com/images/h22eg_install.jpg

Either way, great looking install. Very clean.
 
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 01:39 AM
  #28  
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,519
From: South Central
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

My bad it is a eg but it makes no difference
 
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #29  
Nail I3unny's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,702
From:
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

engine bay wise EGs and EKs are about the same. except theres about 1 cubic foot extra in the EK on the right of the block by the timing belt and such
 
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #30  
yaserkali's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 18
From:
Default RE: Turbo vs. all motor

After reading all of the above, I think it's best to use a D if you're thinking of a turbo upgrade. I found a Greddy turbo, stage 3 on ebay for only £450! why is it so cheap??? ANy issues or problems with this one?? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMEWA%3AIT
 



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 AM.