2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
according to the 2008 Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy’s fuel economy guidebook.
Lowest Overall Fuel Economy Models for 2008 Model Year
Rank Manufacturer/Model City/Highway MPG
1. Lamborghini Murcielago (E-Gear) 8/13
2. Bugatti Veyron 8/14
3. Lamborghini Murcielago (manual) 9/14
4. Bentley Azure/Arnage RL 9/15
5. Ferrari 612 Scaglietti (F1) 9/16
6. Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder (manual), 10/15, Ferrari 612 Scaglietti (manual), Bentley Arnage
7. Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 10/16, Aston Martin DB9 Coupe, Aston Martin DB9 Volante, Mercedes-Benz Maybach (all models)
8. Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe (manual) 10/17, Bentley Continental GT, Bentley Continental GTC, Bentley Continental Flying Spur,
9. Mercedes-Benz G55 AMG 11/13
10. Jeep Grand Cherokee 4WD 11/14,
Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG
Highest Overall Fuel Economy Models for 2008 Model Year
Class Model City/Highway MPG
1. Toyota Prius (hybrid-electric) 48/45
2. Honda Civic Hybrid 40/45
3. Nissan Altima Hybrid 35/33
4. Ford Escape Hybrid FWD 34/30, Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD, Mercury Mariner Hybrid FWD
5. Toyota Camry Hybrid 33/34
6. Toyota Yaris (manual) 29/36
7. Toyota Yaris (automatic) 29/35
8. Ford Escape Hybrid 4WD 29/27, Mazda Tribute Hybrid 4WD, Mercury Mariner Hybrid 4WD
9. Toyota Corolla (manual) 28/37
10. Honda Fit (manual) 28/34

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

its pretty sad that my 16 year old car gets almost the same fuel economy as a new hybrid

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

tru, mine 2, they should just screw the hybrids and bring back the old toyotas and hondas and everything will be more fuel effiecient

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

exsatly^ when my cx was stock it got around 40mpg, and the vx models are suppose to get 45mpg with the vtec-e

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

WOW! Mycivic ranks #3 in most efficient.

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

You forgot the diesels. TDI... somewhere around 55 mph if I remember correctly? Above 40 I know that for sure.

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

They can't. There's absolutely no way those cars could meet today's safety requirements. Crumple zones, multiple airbags, ABS, stability control, etc. Those all add weight and those older cars generallydon't have them. Toyota and Honda would get destroyed in the press for putting out a 1-star crash test car.

Also, those old cars were missing lots of other weight -stuff we take for granted now - a lot of them didn't have power steering, power brakes, power windows, AC insome cases, etc.

In response to the originallist, I'm notsurprised to see the high-peformance cars (Lambo, Bugatti, etc) on there, but a JeepGrand Cherokee? Geez.

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

I got 18-19MPG with my buddy's 5.7LHemi Grand Cherokee Limited with full-time 4WD. I set the cruise at 55-60MPH. He usually gets 13-15MPG. When he tows his 6,000+lb boat, it gets even worse. For 340HP or so, I guess that's not too bad for a luxury gas SUV with AWDthat can tow 7200lb.

I don't think the SRT 6.1L Hemi version does any better on mileage, and I don't think it'll tow as much, but the power is pretty insane for an SUV.

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

Diesel engines are really an amazing thing. They get amazing fuel economy. Everybody talks about hybrids as bieng so efficient but diesels have been around forever and they the same fuel economy. The only drawback to a diesel is that they pollute the enviroment alot more than a gasoline engine because of they fuel they burn. Diesels also have a major advantage, they can burn just about anything. You can make diesel fuel from corn, soy beans, and even french fry oil. The creater of the diesel intended that the diesel engine be something that can burn any fuel.

RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
 

I love diesel engines. Those and rotary engines are very impressive, though unfortunately have slight drawbacks =/ Diesels also tend to last a lot longer (depenind on the driver of course).