RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
that list i 2 things... 1)Sucks 2) Wrong.. the Ford GT isn't even on that list.. Top Gear did a test and it was only getting 4 Mpg on a road trip
And anyone that says they get 48, or even 45 mpg in a Prius is lying |
RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
ORIGINAL: Fiirkan that list i 2 things... 1)Sucks 2) Wrong.. the Ford GT isn't even on that list.. Top Gear did a test and it was only getting 4 Mpg on a road trip And anyone that says they get 48, or even 45 mpg in a Prius is lying |
RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
Everything listed there is BS. those are numbers provided form the manufacturer, not from driving them, the general rule of thumb is that you will get what it shows for city will be your average of your gas mileage,
|
RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
Here's my list
Top 5 Worst: CT 2004 (here's to hoping there are Dane Cook fans here) Boeing 747 Ford f-150 towing that Boeing A nuclear submarine My honda in 4 inches of wet snow Top 5 best: Mountain bike A pair of sturdy legs Skateboard Getting driven around by a friend (indirectly getting me infinite mpg) Reaching level 1 super saiyan and being able to teleport I think this list is more accurate. |
RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
Nuclear power is actually very efficient. You get alot of power out of the nuclear material.
|
RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
I should have seen that coming :(
|
RE: 2008 Top 10 least (and most) fuel efficient cars
ORIGINAL: Fiirkan Everything listed there is BS. those are numbers provided form the manufacturer, not from driving them, the general rule of thumb is that you will get what it shows for city will be your average of your gas mileage, |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands