north korea has a dictator. he gots nukes too (according to CIA officials).

and Iran gots nukes too. why didn't we take them out first?

*no oil*

 

Cool, then maybe we should overthrow the following countries rulers too:
1. Our friends of Saudi Arabia
2. North Korea
3. Cuba
4. Libya
5. Kuwait, which we fought so hard to reestablich when Hussein invaded

And I'm sure there's plenty more. As for the "funding" you claim he did, the only provable indirect terrorist funding he did was give money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. <-----------Wrong, yes, but in no way directly affects the U.S. Plus, if you really want to break down the terrorist funding schemes, do a little research into the Saudi Royal Family. They have some pretty thick dirt on their hands. And isn't it weird how the State Department releases a report that concludes we're less safe now, than before we invaded Iraq? I mean, who would of thought? And yes I do now how our government works, but when you have both houses controlled by Republicans, along with the executive branch, it's likely that they'll agree and support one another. When the weapons inspectors find nothing, and several other countries find nothing ie. France, Germany, Spain, then don't you think there might be some bogus and/or fabricated intelligence floating around. Basically what we're doing now is looking stupid in front of the world "staying the course" and draining our treasury to trying to force democracy on a people who very well might not be ready for it. So I'll keep my shop set up on the left side of the political spectrum.

 

Good point

 

clinton was the shizznite!

 

As for Libya, we do have troops over there. My Uncle just came back from fighting terrorist cells there. But otherwise, yeah I see your point, I shouldn't have went off like that.

 

this is a perfect example of why republicans and democrats should never marry. lol.

 

btw, clinton was the shiznat but DAAAAAMMMM, he coulda got a motel room! lol.

 

So you are saying that Iraq had WMDs? What proof do you have? If you want to use the Bush Adminstration evidence, it is so wrong that Bush went on television earlier this week and admitted to using false intelegence. So if Bush says there aren't WMDs, why are you saying that there is? And there is no connection between 9/11 and Iraq, that is a known fact.

 

Yeah my bad dude. I didn't see that on the news. I think I'll vote for Nader.

 

who would remmeber that? he had style.