Link.

Interesting debate about the authenticity of the photos in the link. I say photochopped, but a damn good job of it.

 

Fake. The lighting angle is the same on the guys face in all the pics. And if you look at the fur on the boar in the first pic its a lot shorter than the boar's fur in the second pic so it's not the same animal. Nice job on the chop whoever did it but it has some flaws.

 

Absolutely fake. The lighting on his face in the first picture doesn't match the rest of the picture at all; the shadowing would indicate overcast, whereas he has decent lighting on his face. And like v8 said, the fur is different between the pics.

 

I'd hit it.

 

what the canadian said