Ok the last one was very open and vague. Try this one.
The Brady Bill. You know, the one that put restrictions on the purchase and ownership of an automatic weapon and was supposed to lower the level of crimes committed using these weapons. Well, recent research has shown that this bill was very ineffective in this regard.
The question is: Should we put more restrictions on purchasing guns? Not just automatic weapons, but all guns. If you think that we should, please explain why.
Thanks. Have fun with this.

Nick

 

That's funny, cuz last time I checked, all firearms can kill people! I say put restrictions on all gun sales. So what if they get tracked, etc. If you're not the guy/girl who's gonna go around shooting people, what do you have to worry about? It's for the preservation of your life and your next door neighbor, and every living soul you encounter. Cuz the next guy to walk into Walmart could be shootin' and could be the guy this bill is trying to stop. And BTW, what would anyone who is just protecting their home or hunting need with an Israeli UZI? I know it's a little too late, but they should have just standardized a few different models of handguns, rifles, etc. for civilian use. I prefer the 9mm, cuz we carry it every time we fly! (Yeah AF!!!) Prolly won't help you much, but that's my $.02!

 

NO!

[IMG]local://upfiles/5240/19CBB41514FE4E0491C1A1BB9A85E1FB.gif[/IMG]