YO DOMESTICDANE_!!
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 26
From: North Western NJ
YO DOMESTICDANE_!!
just like to let you know a cummins turbo diesel sux and tryin to get the amount of hp u claim out of it is virtually impossible. I have an F250 Turbo Diesel riding 700hp and 1300ft-lbs on a banks 6 shooter. And Ford makes the best diesel. Sh*t they even sold the cummins project to dodge cuz dodge's version of a diesel didnt even have a turbo... and obv the merecedes SLK AMG is going to be faster, its a 100,000 + car. Thatd be like saying i can take my BMW M5 against a 3 year old on a tricycle. Oh yea and hey buddy that chevelle with a 768 cu. No way that is street legal... but your probably in a little rednecky state that allow you to drive with your flannel shirts, steel toe boots, garth brooks sticker on the truck bumper and tight jeans.. sound good larry the cable guy wannabe?
btw all this was his post:
DOMESTICDANE_!! at 6/14/2006 3:05:35 AM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HONDAS SUCK ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I COULD PUT A 15000LB BOAT ON THE BACK OF MY CUMMINS, AND YOU STILL COULDNT HANG...DYNOED AT BULLY DOG HOUSTON....721HP, AND 1289FT/LBS....BEAT THOSE NUMBERS...AND THERES STILL ROOM FOR MORE...THATS NOT WHAT I MEANT WHEN I SAID RACE....EITHER MY TWIN-TURBO SL65 AMG MERCEDES V12---604HP,CRAZY TORQUE STOCK---,OR MY 768CU IN. 69 CHEVELLE---871 BLOWER, 1220HP..1420FT LBS---9.9SEC 1/4 AT 179...WITH A ****TY 3.4 60' FOOT TIME....HELL, ID RACE YOU RICE BOYS IN MY 1982 MERCEDES 300 TURBO DIESEL...THAT'D BE A TIGHT RACE
btw all this was his post:
DOMESTICDANE_!! at 6/14/2006 3:05:35 AM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HONDAS SUCK ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I COULD PUT A 15000LB BOAT ON THE BACK OF MY CUMMINS, AND YOU STILL COULDNT HANG...DYNOED AT BULLY DOG HOUSTON....721HP, AND 1289FT/LBS....BEAT THOSE NUMBERS...AND THERES STILL ROOM FOR MORE...THATS NOT WHAT I MEANT WHEN I SAID RACE....EITHER MY TWIN-TURBO SL65 AMG MERCEDES V12---604HP,CRAZY TORQUE STOCK---,OR MY 768CU IN. 69 CHEVELLE---871 BLOWER, 1220HP..1420FT LBS---9.9SEC 1/4 AT 179...WITH A ****TY 3.4 60' FOOT TIME....HELL, ID RACE YOU RICE BOYS IN MY 1982 MERCEDES 300 TURBO DIESEL...THAT'D BE A TIGHT RACE
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,358
RE: YO DOMESTICDANE_!!
first of all, what is the point of making a thread directed at a troll? he obviously has no idea what he is talking about...and ive never seen a 768cubic inch chevy motor...im sure that they exist, but theyre pointless. the nhra motors are making 6000+hp on far less than that, plus, he he had a short time of 3.4, he would need a mph of like 250 to still hit a 9.9ET...
also, needing 1220hp to run high 9s is sad..a properly setup mustang will do that with half that power. and there is no cubic inch limitation for street legality.
second, a well modded cummins would DEVOUR a garbage powerstroke. stock for stock the powerstroke is faster, but there are FAR more mods for the dodge. in case you havent noticed, the banks touring race trucks are dodges...and their record holding truck in the quarter mile and salt flats is a banks modified, cummins powered dakota.
have a look: http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=30183
dodge > ford...the only reason anyone buys ford trucks is because theyre cheap.
also, needing 1220hp to run high 9s is sad..a properly setup mustang will do that with half that power. and there is no cubic inch limitation for street legality.second, a well modded cummins would DEVOUR a garbage powerstroke. stock for stock the powerstroke is faster, but there are FAR more mods for the dodge. in case you havent noticed, the banks touring race trucks are dodges...and their record holding truck in the quarter mile and salt flats is a banks modified, cummins powered dakota.
have a look: http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=30183
dodge > ford...the only reason anyone buys ford trucks is because theyre cheap.
