Saddam to HANG! YES HANG!
ORIGINAL: Ben
Look, nothing I say is going to change your views on anything that has happened, as the same goes for what you say to me. I believe what I believe, and you believe as you will. There are viable reasons as to the United States going over there, but theres no sense in arguing with someone set in there ways....which I am as well so it wont get anywhere.
Look, nothing I say is going to change your views on anything that has happened, as the same goes for what you say to me. I believe what I believe, and you believe as you will. There are viable reasons as to the United States going over there, but theres no sense in arguing with someone set in there ways....which I am as well so it wont get anywhere.
No one wins in a war.
USA probably lost more than anyone else. But still both sides lost alot of people, too many innocent ones at that.
You would be surprised how the top terrorists of the world we're funded from the very countries they attack. It's quite disgusting how they seem to be repeating the same god damn mistakes, over and over again. I swear if money was not an issue I bet we would never have wars or terrorists, well...maybe it would be worse? I don't know but humankind better wake the **** up and smell the coffey soon.
Anyone read my earlier post?
Toodles.
USA probably lost more than anyone else. But still both sides lost alot of people, too many innocent ones at that.
You would be surprised how the top terrorists of the world we're funded from the very countries they attack. It's quite disgusting how they seem to be repeating the same god damn mistakes, over and over again. I swear if money was not an issue I bet we would never have wars or terrorists, well...maybe it would be worse? I don't know but humankind better wake the **** up and smell the coffey soon.
Anyone read my earlier post?

Toodles.
ORIGINAL: AgentofDarkness
how did we win? Have 3000+ dead American soldiers and a huge *** defeciet as well as a lot of people who do not like us. Do you have a poll that proves taht a majority of iraqis like the occupation? You still haven't told me why we don't go helping everyone in need.
ORIGINAL: Ben
This was a necesary war that needed to be fought, and both sides won.
This was a necesary war that needed to be fought, and both sides won.
ORIGINAL: love_my_si
ya 3000 soldiers kia. horrible. or we could just wait for a repeat of 9/11 and lose a few thousand more and have everyone feel like the government is doing jack... and we got off easy with the world trade centers, if they would have hit a sporting event or other big gathering we could have lost that many people 10 times over. i know in U of M's stadium there are 100,000 + people. and just to be curious, how many people lost there lives in WW2. i fail to see how a number like 3000 would sway your choice on the war. how many enemies have been killed?
ya 3000 soldiers kia. horrible. or we could just wait for a repeat of 9/11 and lose a few thousand more and have everyone feel like the government is doing jack... and we got off easy with the world trade centers, if they would have hit a sporting event or other big gathering we could have lost that many people 10 times over. i know in U of M's stadium there are 100,000 + people. and just to be curious, how many people lost there lives in WW2. i fail to see how a number like 3000 would sway your choice on the war. how many enemies have been killed?
Do you all know what my country (in ww2, not now) would have done if they were to have taken control of the USA?... YOU ALL WOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED! It is called "yuu-etsu-kan" and it means "ultimate superiority over all nations" and all japanese were all taught that white people and sub-asians were inferior pigs and should die. Look at bataan, corregidor, midway... those are only a taste of how blood thirsty the japanese were. Your country killed over 300,000 people with the bomb and to this day there are many people I know that are still affected by the bomb in many little ways.
but 300,000 in exchange for an incredibly strong alliance and wealth, not to mention the safety of 200 million americans. that is worth stopping someone for. To say we had no business there in Iraq is very dumb. You just wait until those terrorist blow up your friends in school or your family shopping downtown and check your feelings then.
When we removed Sadaam we only uncovered more of the insects under the rock. Now we need to exterminate the real danger that infests the foundation.
but 300,000 in exchange for an incredibly strong alliance and wealth, not to mention the safety of 200 million americans. that is worth stopping someone for. To say we had no business there in Iraq is very dumb. You just wait until those terrorist blow up your friends in school or your family shopping downtown and check your feelings then.
When we removed Sadaam we only uncovered more of the insects under the rock. Now we need to exterminate the real danger that infests the foundation.
ORIGINAL: AgentofDarkness
SO you want somebody to die, it doesn't matter if they actually did anything. The only thing that invading Iraq did was create more terrorists to fight.
ORIGINAL: love_my_si
ya 3000 soldiers kia. horrible. or we could just wait for a repeat of 9/11 and lose a few thousand more and have everyone feel like the government is doing jack... and we got off easy with the world trade centers, if they would have hit a sporting event or other big gathering we could have lost that many people 10 times over. i know in U of M's stadium there are 100,000 + people. and just to be curious, how many people lost there lives in WW2. i fail to see how a number like 3000 would sway your choice on the war. how many enemies have been killed?
ya 3000 soldiers kia. horrible. or we could just wait for a repeat of 9/11 and lose a few thousand more and have everyone feel like the government is doing jack... and we got off easy with the world trade centers, if they would have hit a sporting event or other big gathering we could have lost that many people 10 times over. i know in U of M's stadium there are 100,000 + people. and just to be curious, how many people lost there lives in WW2. i fail to see how a number like 3000 would sway your choice on the war. how many enemies have been killed?
ORIGINAL: TheMoogly
Do you all know what my country (in ww2, not now) would have done if they were to have taken control of the USA?... YOU ALL WOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED! It is called "yuu-etsu-kan" and it means "ultimate superiority over all nations" and all japanese were all taught that white people and sub-asians were inferior pigs and should die. Look at bataan, corregidor, midway... those are only a taste of how blood thirsty the japanese were.
Do you all know what my country (in ww2, not now) would have done if they were to have taken control of the USA?... YOU ALL WOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED! It is called "yuu-etsu-kan" and it means "ultimate superiority over all nations" and all japanese were all taught that white people and sub-asians were inferior pigs and should die. Look at bataan, corregidor, midway... those are only a taste of how blood thirsty the japanese were.
ORIGINAL: civicexracer
damn...why'd i post this...politics sure does bring out the worst in ppl. reason why i will never vote or get in the mess of politics
damn...why'd i post this...politics sure does bring out the worst in ppl. reason why i will never vote or get in the mess of politics
And I dont even need to respond to your comment, Misha... You are not a lawyer so do not try to spin my words here... just watch the video.


