THe 9/11 Commission reported that Saddam Hussain and Iraq had no part in 9/11 so that is who i will believe.

 

9/11 commission says he had no ties... but just like slobodan milosevic he needed to be removed from power... do you agree with that? Do you feel he was even a bad person and didnt deserve the power he held?

 

The Saw movies can give us some good ideas for that man......

 

You're ****ing crazy, Moog. At first you were saying Saddam was a horrible person because of all the things he did to his own people. Then you say the Middle East should be wiped off the map? I don't know if i'm reading this wrong or what, but that sounds awful hypocritical.

 

Okay okay lets rephrase then.... LETS FIND EVERYONE THAT SIGNS UP TO BE A TERRORIST AND KILL THEM!! When I say lets nuke the m.e. and start over there was sarcasm dripping from it, so lets calm down everyone...

Terrorists are soldiers and thus give us the right to kill them before they blow YOU up.

 

This video is called "propaganda", if you did not know this. The trick is to show only one side of the story and call it the whole story.
As for spinning your words - I did not spin anything, I just put together two comments of you.

 

Misha you got to be kidding me! That is statistical fact you idiot! Google it! I'm done writing on this thread! MIND BLOWING STUPIDITY!!! So is that news manufactured, then? Because it was broadcasted on CNN... most likely the SAME place you get your news!! My gosh you people scare me... When my wife and I move back to Japan we will miss this country... and how the people used to have common sense and optimism.

Nice idea for Sadaam Flip!

Bye Guys and Misha, please... NEVER REPRODUCE.

 

So now your flip floping. First you said the U.S. had to go into Iraq to fight terrorism and now you say the U.S. had to go into Iraq to remove Saddam Hussain. #1, which do you choose. #2, Why remove Hussain? We had no legal right to do so. If you use the moral arguement of he is a dictator, war criminal, etc what about all the other dictators, war criminals? SHould we not go and remove them from power also?

 

You are getting too personal. In the old times I would kill you for those words. Nowadays I do not have any other means as reporting youe violation of forum rules to admins.

 

the ONLY reason we should have removed him is IF we found WMD's, in which case he would be considered a threat to the whole world, but since we did not, it is his country that he has control of and can do what he wants with, and it is not our business to get involved with anyway. Oh yeah, the sh*t he did was f*cked up, but honestly, its on the other side of the globe, why is that our business?

And Agentofdarkness, yeah i think leaders such as Kim Jil (sp?) of North Korea should defiantely be taken out of power, but i would never wnat the US to even attempt that just becasue of what might happen in the war between when we first invade and when he is actaully out of power.