Of course I get your point. What I'm trying to do is get you and others to understand mine. If your goal is to build a real as opposed to false case against this dead boy, then use true facts as opposed to flimsy hypotheticals.

Again, don't use the fact that God took the boy to mean that he was all bad. God takes good people every day.

 

In my opinion, your statements are harsh.

How does this Karma work when good people are similarly killed while driving?

How would one properly disagree with you and still avoid attacking your judgment?

Who said this?

Maybe they had a very important hand in this.

 

Wow, just saw this.

Leave it to nature to set things straight. That tree kicked his ***. Or, face. He got what any car thief deserves and that's that. What he stole was more valuable than just the sum of car parts. He stole countless hours of work time. You can get more money but our time here is limited. Punisher used a lot of his time on that car and now has nothing but a crumpled mess to show for it.

I hereby nominate the car thief for a Darwin Award.

 

im done argueing with jesus here. thats my opinion and you saying my opinion isnt right is just your opinion and wont change mine in any way!
he was a grown *** man 23years old that chose his lifestyle. he was in control of his own life.
we can bitch back and forth all day long whos right but all were doing it taking up bandwidth.

 

I see what you're doing here, and I understand your points. But again, you're twisting the purpose of the message.

You can't have opinions on top of opinions, it just defeats the original discussion.

I didn't say karma plays a part in everyones mishaps, just his.

There is no proper way to disagree with an argument, just one way. And I commented on the OP's statement and didn't ask for attacks from people like 96 civic something. All they have to do is state theirs just as I did, again, not very hard to do. This argument is turning into a moral debate, which have no answers, so just quit while you think you're ahead.

That was a statement implying that I'm not the bad guy here for having an opinion that differs from others.

And again, you're trying to make it seem like I'm blaming the parents, which I didn't. All of this information is through text, of all people, I thought you would realize that you can't thoroughly examine each statement because you'll twist the information in your head just by thinking of it.

 

At this point, we've heard that either God or Karma deemed the thief to be irredeemable and therefore gave the nod to take his life. Bradley now creatively brings in a new force, Nature, that apparently has the ability to rectify all wrongs. If you understood Darwin's theory of evolution, however, you would know that even fit ("good") individuals die during the evolutionary process, as Nature turns out to be quite capricious.

With all of these powerful and mysterious forces on your side, you guys must be right. It's just curious that you feel the need to invoke the supernatural to support your opinions.

Read the thread Marcus. It was not I who invoked almighty God to support my stand in this thread, it was you and others. I simply pointed out the Grand Canyon-sized flaw in your assumptions that He was necessarily on your side for this issue.

 

Before you argue about karma, people have different definitions of the word, so leave this argument out, all else is fair game, lol. This is getting funny.

 

Buddy, read what I am saying. I wouldn't waste my time posting comments at HCF if I didn't see some value in the forum and its members. You realize that I am not saying that any of you with whom I disagree here are bad people. I am just taking the unpopular side of a controversial topic that was very one sided until I took an interest. I actually agree with 96 Civic DX's viewpoint on this subject. Left alone, however, he would just be bullied by you guys. It's ironic that now you guys complain when I begin to ask hard questions about the logic and morality of your opinions.

 

Look man, they're opinions. I do read the posts, and opinions do not always reflect the moral character of a person, so I don't assume you know my moral preference. There is no 'popular' side to the debate, just my own and many others. I don't 'bully' people, lol, they tend to do it to themselves, I have no interests in anyone elses opinions on here, because it's like fiction. I don't see irony here, you're just twisting my statements to form a counterargument to continue an ongoing debate, which I'm not interested in. They're not hard questions, arguing through a matter of text can't take place of a true debate. Trust me, I'm all for a good debate, they're fun, but you have to remember, there's no winner, just reasoning around it.

 

so what we have to explain everything to you?
WOW is all i can say about that BS.
and bullied..... whos bullying who? 96 was the one that said "take your big egoes and shove them up your ***."
"controversial topic" what is this going into some kinda law at the senate? these are opinions!
you alone have turned 2-3 peoples opinions into your own personal vendetta to ***** up 3pages trying to prove the point in your head. keep posting maybe you can do 10 pages before tomorrow.
i guess youve never had your hard work stolen and turned into a total loss. the guy dieing well that is his fault and no one elses he made every choice adding up to that last turn.
ive had friends get hit by drunk drivers and seriously hurt. so ya im one sided on this issue. he made the choices that contributed to where he ended up.
im done with this stupid pointless argument. unsubscribe now