good point..
have a look at these pictures.

the first is a 1999 durango...the second is a 2005 durango. different platform, compeltely different body, different engine options, different interior...same vehicle name...




[IMG]local://upfiles/858/70D3DDE003074DE0960C289F942C2E79.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/8806320A2B3A46F38260EF04D4F3C24C.jpg[/IMG]

the third is a 1988 cavalier...the fourth is a 1998 cavalier...different engine options..different body...different interior...same vehicle name...

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/4B5A4BA675A9469EA966D70719AC1905.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/FEDAFB773775416B904B1F003E3452E6.jpg[/IMG]

you would have to admit that there was more of a change between the first and second gen cavalier then there was between the last cavalier, and the cobalt...

 

Cobaltowner I wasn't trying to knock the car, I actually think it is a nice car. The hp ratings I gave came of chevrolet web site I was a lil lazy to get the torque ratings. The interior is alot like Civic's but it also looks very different. I like the way the Civic looks more you might like the Cobalts more. Not everyone likes the same thing. I do not like the shifter in that you have to pull up a lever to get in reverse. Overall I have to say the interior is pretty nice, but the body style that it had I really did not like. Someone else out there will come along and like it and that will be there car. I like the Civic that is what I like, you like the Cobalt. If you own it and like it that is all that counts.

 

yes that is 06si patrick when i line my cobalt up to a friends 04 cavy their is a good bit difference but its ok.... im about to having my sedan doing 15 flat or better soon about to add a few things to see if i can beat my 15.7@88